Cancer and IVF: assessing fertility preservation options and associated cancer risks

Abstract Background Cancer treatments often pose significant risks to fertility, particularly among women diagnosed during their reproductive years. In vitro fertilization (IVF) and related assisted reproductive techniques have become essential strategies for fertility preservation in these patients. However, concerns persist regarding the potential cancer risks associated with fertility treatments, particularly hormonal stimulation, necessitating a balanced evaluation of the benefits and potential harms. Results This review evaluates current IVF-based fertility preservation techniques, their efficacy, safety, and implications for cancer patients. Key fertility preservation strategies discussed include ovarian transposition, embryo cryopreservation, controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for cancer patients, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. These methods allow preservation of reproductive potential without substantially delaying essential cancer therapies. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence-driven embryo selection and personalized stimulation protocols are highlighted for their potential to enhance reproductive outcomes and reduce hormonal exposure, thereby mitigating theoretical risks associated with fertility medications. Nonetheless, the relationship between fertility treatments and cancer remains complex. While most extensive cohort studies suggest minimal or no significant increase in breast cancer risk following fertility treatment, certain subgroups, including women undergoing multiple hormonal stimulation cycles or those genetically predisposed to cancer, may experience slightly elevated risks. Additionally, there is growing evidence indicating an increased risk of specific cancers, particularly paediatric hepatic tumours, among children conceived through IVF procedures. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing research and cautious interpretation of fertility treatment-associated risks. Conclusion IVF-based fertility preservation strategies offer critical reproductive options for women undergoing cancer treatment. Although generally safe, the nuanced relationship between fertility treatments and cancer risks emphasizes the importance of personalized, evidence-based approaches. Continued research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and comprehensive patient counselling are essential to optimize reproductive outcomes and safeguard the long-term health of cancer survivors and their offspring. Graphical abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-025-01368-6
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cancer and IVF: assessing fertility preservation options and associated cancer risks

Rajgourab Ghosh, Oindrila Sarkar, Sayan Sharma
Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
article

Cancer and IVF: assessing fertility preservation options and associated cancer risks

Rajgourab Ghosh, Oindrila Sarkar, Sayan Sharma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cancer treatments often pose significant risks to fertility, particularly among women diagnosed during their reproductive years. In vitro fertilization (IVF) and related assisted reproductive techniques have become essential strategies for fertility preservation in these patients. However, concerns persist regarding the potential cancer risks associated with fertility treatments, particularly hormonal stimulation, necessitating a balanced evaluation of the benefits and potential harms. Results This review evaluates current IVF-based fertility preservation techniques, their efficacy, safety, and implications for cancer patients. Key fertility preservation strategies discussed include ovarian transposition, embryo cryopreservation, controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for cancer patients, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. These methods allow preservation of reproductive potential without substantially delaying essential cancer therapies. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence-driven embryo selection and personalized stimulation protocols are highlighted for their potential to enhance reproductive outcomes and reduce hormonal exposure, thereby mitigating theoretical risks associated with fertility medications. Nonetheless, the relationship between fertility treatments and cancer remains complex. While most extensive cohort studies suggest minimal or no significant increase in breast cancer risk following fertility treatment, certain subgroups, including women undergoing multiple hormonal stimulation cycles or those genetically predisposed to cancer, may experience slightly elevated risks. Additionally, there is growing evidence indicating an increased risk of specific cancers, particularly paediatric hepatic tumours, among children conceived through IVF procedures. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing research and cautious interpretation of fertility treatment-associated risks. Conclusion IVF-based fertility preservation strategies offer critical reproductive options for women undergoing cancer treatment. Although generally safe, the nuanced relationship between fertility treatments and cancer risks emphasizes the importance of personalized, evidence-based approaches. Continued research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and comprehensive patient counselling are essential to optimize reproductive outcomes and safeguard the long-term health of cancer survivors and their offspring. Graphical abstract

Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research CenterVol. 49(1)
Amity University (AE)
University of Otago, Amity University
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.