Measurement invariance and discriminant validity of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire across five Spanish-speaking countries

According to acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), cognitive fusion is a critical process contributing to psychopathology and behavioral ineffectiveness. The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) is the most used tool to assess this process and has been validated in various languages, including Spanish. However, the factorial equivalence of the CFQ across countries has been scarcely investigated, thereby precluding cross-cultural analyses of cognitive fusion. Additionally, it is necessary to explore the discriminant validity of the CFQ in relation to emotional symptoms to ensure that it assesses a distinct construct from negative emotions. Accordingly, this study examined the CFQ’s factorial equivalence and discriminant validity in relation to emotional symptoms across samples from five Spanish-speaking countries: Colombia, Peru, Mexico, Chile, and Spain (total sample of 3389 participants). The CFQ demonstrated good psychometric properties in all samples, and the one-factor model showed measurement invariance across countries. The CFQ also demonstrated discriminant validity in relation to the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale – 21 (DASS-21). In conclusion, the CFQ appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring cognitive fusion across Spanish-speaking countries, and it measures a construct distinct from negative emotions. • The CFQ showed a one-factor model across five Spanish-speaking countries. • The one-factor model showed factorial equivalence across countries. • The CFQ demonstrated adequate discriminant validity in relation to emotional symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100954
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement invariance and discriminant validity of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire across five Spanish-speaking countries

Samuel O. Ortiz, Francisco José Ruiz, Rodrigo Miguel Rosales Sarabia, C. Missy Moore et al.
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Behavioral Health and Interventions
article

Measurement invariance and discriminant validity of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire across five Spanish-speaking countries

Samuel O. Ortiz, Francisco José Ruiz, Rodrigo Miguel Rosales Sarabia, C. Missy Moore, Betty Peña, Paula Odriozola-González, Carlos Santamaría, Carlos Montoya
article en

Abstract

According to acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), cognitive fusion is a critical process contributing to psychopathology and behavioral ineffectiveness. The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) is the most used tool to assess this process and has been validated in various languages, including Spanish. However, the factorial equivalence of the CFQ across countries has been scarcely investigated, thereby precluding cross-cultural analyses of cognitive fusion. Additionally, it is necessary to explore the discriminant validity of the CFQ in relation to emotional symptoms to ensure that it assesses a distinct construct from negative emotions. Accordingly, this study examined the CFQ’s factorial equivalence and discriminant validity in relation to emotional symptoms across samples from five Spanish-speaking countries: Colombia, Peru, Mexico, Chile, and Spain (total sample of 3389 participants). The CFQ demonstrated good psychometric properties in all samples, and the one-factor model showed measurement invariance across countries. The CFQ also demonstrated discriminant validity in relation to the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale – 21 (DASS-21). In conclusion, the CFQ appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring cognitive fusion across Spanish-speaking countries, and it measures a construct distinct from negative emotions. • The CFQ showed a one-factor model across five Spanish-speaking countries. • The one-factor model showed factorial equivalence across countries. • The CFQ demonstrated adequate discriminant validity in relation to emotional symptoms.

Journal of Contextual Behavioral ScienceVol. 38
Universidad de Cantabria (ES), Universidad Iberoamericana (MX), Contextual Change (United States) (US), Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.