Mining industry approaches to risk and responsibility: managing safety in outsourced environments

Abstract The mining industry remains a high-risk sector where safety management is increasingly complicated by outsourcing and multi-employer arrangements. This paper explores how formal safety management is organized and practiced across company boundaries in the Swedish mining industry. Drawing on qualitative data from a research project focusing on workshops, company meetings, and industry-level discussions, the study examines how client companies, contractors, and the national trade association have sought to address safety-related challenges arising in contractor-dominated worksites. Findings reveal that outsourcing has introduced fragmentation, unclear responsibilities, and coordination difficulties, often exacerbated by asymmetrical power relations between clients and contractors. In response, companies and the industry association have implemented formal measures aimed at clarifying legal duties, codifying routines, and supporting key boundary-spanning roles, such as operative coordinators. While these efforts strengthen procedural clarity and accountability, the study also cautions that formalization may inadvertently increase inter-organizational distance and reduce trust, particularly when monitoring overshadows collaboration. The paper contributes to the literature on occupational health and safety management by showing how regulatory intent and operational practice diverge in complex organizational environments. It highlights the tensions between formal control and practical cooperation in outsourced safety management, suggesting that effective coordination requires more than legal clarity alone. The findings are particularly relevant for practitioners, regulators, and researchers concerned with contractor safety, coordination, and the institutional foundations of responsibility in multi-employer settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mineral Economics
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-025-00555-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mining industry approaches to risk and responsibility: managing safety in outsourced environments

Magnus Nygren
1 citations
Mineral Economics
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
article

Mining industry approaches to risk and responsibility: managing safety in outsourced environments

Magnus Nygren
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The mining industry remains a high-risk sector where safety management is increasingly complicated by outsourcing and multi-employer arrangements. This paper explores how formal safety management is organized and practiced across company boundaries in the Swedish mining industry. Drawing on qualitative data from a research project focusing on workshops, company meetings, and industry-level discussions, the study examines how client companies, contractors, and the national trade association have sought to address safety-related challenges arising in contractor-dominated worksites. Findings reveal that outsourcing has introduced fragmentation, unclear responsibilities, and coordination difficulties, often exacerbated by asymmetrical power relations between clients and contractors. In response, companies and the industry association have implemented formal measures aimed at clarifying legal duties, codifying routines, and supporting key boundary-spanning roles, such as operative coordinators. While these efforts strengthen procedural clarity and accountability, the study also cautions that formalization may inadvertently increase inter-organizational distance and reduce trust, particularly when monitoring overshadows collaboration. The paper contributes to the literature on occupational health and safety management by showing how regulatory intent and operational practice diverge in complex organizational environments. It highlights the tensions between formal control and practical cooperation in outsourced safety management, suggesting that effective coordination requires more than legal clarity alone. The findings are particularly relevant for practitioners, regulators, and researchers concerned with contractor safety, coordination, and the institutional foundations of responsibility in multi-employer settings.

Mineral Economics
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.