Fat-Free Mass Normalization Impacts Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Overweight Adolescents

Accurate assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in adolescents is critical. However, normalizing oxygen consumption (VO2) to body mass (BM) may underestimate CRF in overweight (OW) youth by including metabolically inactive fat mass. This study examined differences in VO2 normalized by BM and fat-free mass (FFM) between normal weight (NW) and OW adolescents. Thirty-eight participants (19 NW, 19 OW; 12–17 years) underwent anthropometric, body composition, and cardiorespiratory fitness assessments. VO2 at the aerobic threshold (VO2AerT), anaerobic threshold (VO2AnT), and peak exercise (VO2peak) were measured and expressed in absolute terms and relative to BM and FFM. Group differences in the main outcomes were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation was used to examine associations between VO2, BM and FFM. When normalized by BM, NW adolescents showed significantly higher VO2AerT (18.7 ± 3.6 vs. 14.5 ± 2.3), VO2AnT (28.8 ± 6.3 vs. 23.6 ± 4.7), and VO2peak (37.7 ± 6.7 vs. 29.1 ± 7.0) compared to OW peers (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found when VO2 values were normalized by FFM. A group difference was observed in the VO2peak vs. BM slope (p = 0.03) but not in the VO2peak vs. FFM slope. FFM normalization provides a more accurate assessment of CRF by accounting for differences in body composition, underscoring the importance of evaluating the aerobic capacity of metabolically active tissue rather than total body weight in youth populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/n2r4-7n04
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fat-Free Mass Normalization Impacts Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Overweight Adolescents

Marco Meucci, Nagaraj Kondagunta, Greeshma C. Ravindran, Valério Bonavolontá et al.
UNC Libraries
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

Fat-Free Mass Normalization Impacts Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Overweight Adolescents

Marco Meucci, Nagaraj Kondagunta, Greeshma C. Ravindran, Valério Bonavolontá, Srijan Oduru, Anvi Charvu
article en

Abstract

Accurate assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in adolescents is critical. However, normalizing oxygen consumption (VO2) to body mass (BM) may underestimate CRF in overweight (OW) youth by including metabolically inactive fat mass. This study examined differences in VO2 normalized by BM and fat-free mass (FFM) between normal weight (NW) and OW adolescents. Thirty-eight participants (19 NW, 19 OW; 12–17 years) underwent anthropometric, body composition, and cardiorespiratory fitness assessments. VO2 at the aerobic threshold (VO2AerT), anaerobic threshold (VO2AnT), and peak exercise (VO2peak) were measured and expressed in absolute terms and relative to BM and FFM. Group differences in the main outcomes were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation was used to examine associations between VO2, BM and FFM. When normalized by BM, NW adolescents showed significantly higher VO2AerT (18.7 ± 3.6 vs. 14.5 ± 2.3), VO2AnT (28.8 ± 6.3 vs. 23.6 ± 4.7), and VO2peak (37.7 ± 6.7 vs. 29.1 ± 7.0) compared to OW peers (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found when VO2 values were normalized by FFM. A group difference was observed in the VO2peak vs. BM slope (p = 0.03) but not in the VO2peak vs. FFM slope. FFM normalization provides a more accurate assessment of CRF by accounting for differences in body composition, underscoring the importance of evaluating the aerobic capacity of metabolically active tissue rather than total body weight in youth populations.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.