Comparison between Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate versus Stromal Vascular Fraction on Osteoarthritis Knee Patients: Meta-Analysis

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a leading cause of disability, with limited nonoperative treatment options that primarily focus on symptom relief rather than disease modification. Cell-based therapies, including bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and stromal vascular fraction (SVF), have emerged as promising alternatives for managing knee OA. However, clinical evidence comparing their efficacy remains limited. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for clinical studies reporting outcomes after a single intra-articular injection of autologous BMAC or SVF in patients with varying degrees of knee OA. Studies involving adjunct procedures, culture-expanded cells, or multiple injections were excluded. Pain reduction, assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional improvement, measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), were the primary outcomes. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Six studies comprising 261 patients (111 BMAC, 150 SVF) were included. Both treatments resulted in significant improvement in pain and function. BMAC reduced mean VAS from 4.5 ± 1.27 to 1.71 ± 0.82 (SMD 2.609; 95% CI, 1.781–3.436), while SVF reduced VAS from 6.1 ± 1.1 to 3.3 ± 1.5 (SMD 3.470; 95% CI, 1.175–5.765). SVF showed significantly greater pain reduction compared with BMAC (P < 0.0001). Both BMAC (SMD 1.403; 95% CI, 0.385–2.421) and SVF (SMD 1.125; 95% CI, 0.497–1.754) demonstrated equivalent functional improvement according to WOMAC scores (P = 0.626). Study heterogeneity and methodological inconsistencies were noted, particularly in cell preparation and reporting standards. Conclusion: A single injection of either BMAC or SVF provides short-term symptomatic relief in knee OA. SVF appears superior to BMAC for pain reduction, while both are equally effective in improving function. Given the heterogeneity of preparation protocols and limited high-quality evidence, results should be interpreted with caution. Further standardized, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to establish definitive recommendations. Keywords: Knee osteoarthritis; Bone marrow aspirate concentrate; Stromal vascular fraction; Cell-based therapy

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Review
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20251003
Primary Topic
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate versus Stromal Vascular Fraction on Osteoarthritis Knee Patients: Meta-Analysis

Putu Bihan Surya Kinanta, I Gede Eka Wiratnaya
International Journal of Research and Review
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
article

Comparison between Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate versus Stromal Vascular Fraction on Osteoarthritis Knee Patients: Meta-Analysis

Putu Bihan Surya Kinanta, I Gede Eka Wiratnaya
article en

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a leading cause of disability, with limited nonoperative treatment options that primarily focus on symptom relief rather than disease modification. Cell-based therapies, including bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and stromal vascular fraction (SVF), have emerged as promising alternatives for managing knee OA. However, clinical evidence comparing their efficacy remains limited. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for clinical studies reporting outcomes after a single intra-articular injection of autologous BMAC or SVF in patients with varying degrees of knee OA. Studies involving adjunct procedures, culture-expanded cells, or multiple injections were excluded. Pain reduction, assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional improvement, measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), were the primary outcomes. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Six studies comprising 261 patients (111 BMAC, 150 SVF) were included. Both treatments resulted in significant improvement in pain and function. BMAC reduced mean VAS from 4.5 ± 1.27 to 1.71 ± 0.82 (SMD 2.609; 95% CI, 1.781–3.436), while SVF reduced VAS from 6.1 ± 1.1 to 3.3 ± 1.5 (SMD 3.470; 95% CI, 1.175–5.765). SVF showed significantly greater pain reduction compared with BMAC (P < 0.0001). Both BMAC (SMD 1.403; 95% CI, 0.385–2.421) and SVF (SMD 1.125; 95% CI, 0.497–1.754) demonstrated equivalent functional improvement according to WOMAC scores (P = 0.626). Study heterogeneity and methodological inconsistencies were noted, particularly in cell preparation and reporting standards. Conclusion: A single injection of either BMAC or SVF provides short-term symptomatic relief in knee OA. SVF appears superior to BMAC for pain reduction, while both are equally effective in improving function. Given the heterogeneity of preparation protocols and limited high-quality evidence, results should be interpreted with caution. Further standardized, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to establish definitive recommendations. Keywords: Knee osteoarthritis; Bone marrow aspirate concentrate; Stromal vascular fraction; Cell-based therapy

International Journal of Research and ReviewVol. 12(10)
Udayana University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.