Does Corruption Explain the Decision to Invest and the Value of Investment? Revisiting Evidence From Sub‐Saharan African Firms

ABSTRACT This article examines how corruption relates to a firm's decision to invest and the value of investment. We use data from the World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES) of firms in Sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA), surveyed between 2010 and 2017. We adopt an instrumental variable approach to address the endogeneity problem. Our results suggest that lower levels of bribe payments enable firms to circumvent bureaucratic hurdles, thus facilitating investment decisions. However, at higher levels of corruption, the relationship is inverse. Corruption distorts the value of firm investment, especially among small firms, those in the manufacturing sector rather than service, and both young and mature firms. The distortionary effects of corruption are worsened by credit constraints. Our findings reaffirm the importance of SSA countries strengthening their fight against corruption to boost firm investment and economic transformation, especially given the dominance of small firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Development
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.70029
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Corruption Explain the Decision to Invest and the Value of Investment? Revisiting Evidence From Sub‐Saharan African Firms

Sunday Nathan, Edward Bbaale, Ibrahim Mike Okumu
Journal of International Development
Corruption and Economic Development
article

Does Corruption Explain the Decision to Invest and the Value of Investment? Revisiting Evidence From Sub‐Saharan African Firms

Sunday Nathan, Edward Bbaale, Ibrahim Mike Okumu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines how corruption relates to a firm's decision to invest and the value of investment. We use data from the World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES) of firms in Sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA), surveyed between 2010 and 2017. We adopt an instrumental variable approach to address the endogeneity problem. Our results suggest that lower levels of bribe payments enable firms to circumvent bureaucratic hurdles, thus facilitating investment decisions. However, at higher levels of corruption, the relationship is inverse. Corruption distorts the value of firm investment, especially among small firms, those in the manufacturing sector rather than service, and both young and mature firms. The distortionary effects of corruption are worsened by credit constraints. Our findings reaffirm the importance of SSA countries strengthening their fight against corruption to boost firm investment and economic transformation, especially given the dominance of small firms.

Journal of International DevelopmentVol. 37(8)
University of Michigan (US), Makerere University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.