Low‐temperature sintered boron‐doped S53P4 bioactive glass scaffolds fabricated by robocasting

Abstract This study investigates boron‐doped S53P4 bioactive glass (BG) scaffolds fabricated via robocasting in the context of bone regeneration strategies by comparing their mechanical performance and bioactive behavior to undoped S53P4 BG scaffolds. Three‐dimensional scaffolds with grid‐like macro architectures were fabricated using gelatin‐based composite inks containing S53P4 BG and 10 wt.% boron‐doped S53P4 BG (S53P4_10B). The scaffolds were sintered at optimized temperatures (900°C for S53P4 and 615°C for S53P4_10B), resulting in an average volumetric shrinkage of 33 vol%. Both scaffold types exhibited high porosity (∼71%) with pore sizes of 584 ± 7 µm (S53P4) and 608 ± 25 µm (S53P4_10B). Compressive strength values of 3.3 ± 1.7 MPa and 1.5 ± 0.4 MPa were respectively measured for S53P4 and for S53P4_10B BG scaffolds. Soaking in simulated body fluid for 14 days resulted in complete surface coverage with calcium‐phosphate‐rich phases, indicating high bioactivity. Antibacterial tests revealed that while crystallization reduced the inhibition zone of S53P4 scaffolds, S53P4_10B scaffolds exhibited significant antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus . Cytocompatibility tests using MG‐63 and ST‐2 cell lines confirmed that scaffold extracts at concentrations ≤1% w/v were noncytotoxic. These results show that boron‐doped BG scaffolds possess bioactivity, antibacterial efficacy, and cytocompatibility, and suggest that their mechanical performance can be further tuned through scaffold design and sintering conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.70292
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low‐temperature sintered boron‐doped S53P4 bioactive glass scaffolds fabricated by robocasting

Dušan Galusek, Ertugrul Varlik, Edgar B. Montúfar, Martin Michálek et al.
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Low‐temperature sintered boron‐doped S53P4 bioactive glass scaffolds fabricated by robocasting

Dušan Galusek, Ertugrul Varlik, Edgar B. Montúfar, Martin Michálek, Abel W. Ourgessa, Aldo Roberto Boccaccini, Qaisar Nawaz, Lenka Drotárová, Si Chen, Martina Vitázková
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates boron‐doped S53P4 bioactive glass (BG) scaffolds fabricated via robocasting in the context of bone regeneration strategies by comparing their mechanical performance and bioactive behavior to undoped S53P4 BG scaffolds. Three‐dimensional scaffolds with grid‐like macro architectures were fabricated using gelatin‐based composite inks containing S53P4 BG and 10 wt.% boron‐doped S53P4 BG (S53P4_10B). The scaffolds were sintered at optimized temperatures (900°C for S53P4 and 615°C for S53P4_10B), resulting in an average volumetric shrinkage of 33 vol%. Both scaffold types exhibited high porosity (∼71%) with pore sizes of 584 ± 7 µm (S53P4) and 608 ± 25 µm (S53P4_10B). Compressive strength values of 3.3 ± 1.7 MPa and 1.5 ± 0.4 MPa were respectively measured for S53P4 and for S53P4_10B BG scaffolds. Soaking in simulated body fluid for 14 days resulted in complete surface coverage with calcium‐phosphate‐rich phases, indicating high bioactivity. Antibacterial tests revealed that while crystallization reduced the inhibition zone of S53P4 scaffolds, S53P4_10B scaffolds exhibited significant antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus . Cytocompatibility tests using MG‐63 and ST‐2 cell lines confirmed that scaffold extracts at concentrations ≤1% w/v were noncytotoxic. These results show that boron‐doped BG scaffolds possess bioactivity, antibacterial efficacy, and cytocompatibility, and suggest that their mechanical performance can be further tuned through scaffold design and sintering conditions.

Journal of the American Ceramic SocietyVol. 109(1)
Central European Institute of Technology (CZ), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Dantec Dynamics (United Kingdom) (GB), Trencianska Univerzita Alexandra Dubceka V Trencine (SK)
Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja, Central European Institute of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.