A Classical Theory of Markets and Effectual Demand

ABSTRACT The paper argues that the Sraffian interpretation of Classical economics overlooks the individual dimension and the role of willingness to pay in Smith's definition of effectual demand. Generalizing a recent Smithian model of individual choice in precapitalistic economies, a model of individual choice in a Sraffian framework is proposed that allows a precise formulation of individual and aggregate effectual demand coherent with Smith's view. The model allows also a short‐period analysis of markets and it provides sufficient conditions for the Classical adjustment process to converge towards the long‐period configuration, thus mitigating Steedman's criticism to the Classical view of gravitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metroeconomica
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12517
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Classical Theory of Markets and Effectual Demand

Antonio D’Agata
Metroeconomica
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

A Classical Theory of Markets and Effectual Demand

Antonio D’Agata
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper argues that the Sraffian interpretation of Classical economics overlooks the individual dimension and the role of willingness to pay in Smith's definition of effectual demand. Generalizing a recent Smithian model of individual choice in precapitalistic economies, a model of individual choice in a Sraffian framework is proposed that allows a precise formulation of individual and aggregate effectual demand coherent with Smith's view. The model allows also a short‐period analysis of markets and it provides sufficient conditions for the Classical adjustment process to converge towards the long‐period configuration, thus mitigating Steedman's criticism to the Classical view of gravitation.

Metroeconomica
University of Catania (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.