Assessing the Effect of High Intensity Interval Training and Fast Continuous Training on Resting Heart Rate and VO2 Max of Adult Athletes

Background: Cardiovascular fitness, measured through Resting Heart Rate (RHR) and Maximal Oxygen Uptake (VO2 Max), is critical for optimizing athletic performance. High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Fast Continuous Training (FCT) are two aerobic conditioning modalities widely used to improve cardiovascular efficiency, but their comparative effects remain insufficiently studied in adult competitive athletes. Aim: This study aimed to compare the effects of an 8-week HIIT and FCT program on RHR and VO2 Max in adult athletes, thereby evaluating the efficacy of each training modality in enhancing aerobic performance. Methods: A randomized controlled trial design was employed involving 90 adult athletes (45 males and 45 females, aged 21-26), randomly located into three groups: HIIT (n=30), FCT (n=30), and Control (n=30). RHR and VO2 Max were assessed during pre- and post-intervention using Polar H10 monitors and Vmax Encore Metabolic Cart, respectively. Data were analysed using ANCOVA (Analysis of Covariance) to control for pre-test differences, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc comparison. Results: Post-intervention results revealed statistically significant improvements in both RHR and VO2 Max across the training groups (p < 0.05). The HIIT group exhibited the most significant reduction in RHR (62.72 bpm) and the highest increase in VO2 Max (52.12 ml/kg/min), outperforming both FCT (RHR = 65.06 bpm; VO2 Max = 49.40 ml/kg/min) and the Control group (RHR = 70.32 bpm; VO2 Max = 41.28 ml/kg/min). Effect sizes were large for both RHR (η² = 0.950) and VO2 Max (η² = 0.982), indicating robust model fit. Conclusion: The findings confirm that both HIIT and FCT are effective in improving cardiovascular parameters among adult athletes, with HIIT demonstrating superior efficacy in a shorter duration. These results support the strategic incorporation of HIIT in training regimens aimed at maximizing aerobic performance and cardiovascular health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Physical Education Fitness and Sports
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54392/ijpefs2533
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Effect of High Intensity Interval Training and Fast Continuous Training on Resting Heart Rate and VO2 Max of Adult Athletes

Priya Dutta, Manish Acharjee
International Journal of Physical Education Fitness and Sports
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Assessing the Effect of High Intensity Interval Training and Fast Continuous Training on Resting Heart Rate and VO2 Max of Adult Athletes

Priya Dutta, Manish Acharjee
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular fitness, measured through Resting Heart Rate (RHR) and Maximal Oxygen Uptake (VO2 Max), is critical for optimizing athletic performance. High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Fast Continuous Training (FCT) are two aerobic conditioning modalities widely used to improve cardiovascular efficiency, but their comparative effects remain insufficiently studied in adult competitive athletes. Aim: This study aimed to compare the effects of an 8-week HIIT and FCT program on RHR and VO2 Max in adult athletes, thereby evaluating the efficacy of each training modality in enhancing aerobic performance. Methods: A randomized controlled trial design was employed involving 90 adult athletes (45 males and 45 females, aged 21-26), randomly located into three groups: HIIT (n=30), FCT (n=30), and Control (n=30). RHR and VO2 Max were assessed during pre- and post-intervention using Polar H10 monitors and Vmax Encore Metabolic Cart, respectively. Data were analysed using ANCOVA (Analysis of Covariance) to control for pre-test differences, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc comparison. Results: Post-intervention results revealed statistically significant improvements in both RHR and VO2 Max across the training groups (p < 0.05). The HIIT group exhibited the most significant reduction in RHR (62.72 bpm) and the highest increase in VO2 Max (52.12 ml/kg/min), outperforming both FCT (RHR = 65.06 bpm; VO2 Max = 49.40 ml/kg/min) and the Control group (RHR = 70.32 bpm; VO2 Max = 41.28 ml/kg/min). Effect sizes were large for both RHR (η² = 0.950) and VO2 Max (η² = 0.982), indicating robust model fit. Conclusion: The findings confirm that both HIIT and FCT are effective in improving cardiovascular parameters among adult athletes, with HIIT demonstrating superior efficacy in a shorter duration. These results support the strategic incorporation of HIIT in training regimens aimed at maximizing aerobic performance and cardiovascular health.

International Journal of Physical Education Fitness and Sports
Gujarat University (IN), Tripura University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.