Al-Ikhtilaf Fi At-Tafsir: An Analysis of the Interpretations of Abdurrahman Ibn Nasir As-Sa’di and Muhammad Quraish Shihab

The interpretation of the Qur'an is a crucial element in understanding the meaning and message of its verses. However, in practice, differences in interpretation, or al-ikhtilaf fi at-tafsir, often occur among both early (salaf) and later (khalaf) scholars, and have existed even since the time of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Al-ikhtilaf fi at-tafsir is divided into two main types: Disagreement that is reducible to a single meaning and Disagreement that is based on multiple meanings, each with its own forms and characteristics. This study uses a library research method and is qualitative in nature. The author found that As-Sa'di's method in interpreting verses containing al-ikhtilaf involves three approaches: not explaining the existence of a difference and choosing the opinion he deems correct; mentioning the difference without choosing one of the opinions; and explaining the difference, then selecting the opinion he deems correct. Meanwhile, Quraish Shihab uses two approaches: explaining the existence of a difference without choosing one of the opinions, and selecting the opinion he deems correct.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal STIU Darul Hikmah
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61086/jstiudh.v11i2.93
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Al-Ikhtilaf Fi At-Tafsir: An Analysis of the Interpretations of Abdurrahman Ibn Nasir As-Sa’di and Muhammad Quraish Shihab

Muhammad Azizan Fitriana, Abdullah Abdullah, Romlah Widayati
Jurnal STIU Darul Hikmah
Education and Islamic Studies
article

Al-Ikhtilaf Fi At-Tafsir: An Analysis of the Interpretations of Abdurrahman Ibn Nasir As-Sa’di and Muhammad Quraish Shihab

Muhammad Azizan Fitriana, Abdullah Abdullah, Romlah Widayati
article en

Abstract

The interpretation of the Qur'an is a crucial element in understanding the meaning and message of its verses. However, in practice, differences in interpretation, or al-ikhtilaf fi at-tafsir, often occur among both early (salaf) and later (khalaf) scholars, and have existed even since the time of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Al-ikhtilaf fi at-tafsir is divided into two main types: Disagreement that is reducible to a single meaning and Disagreement that is based on multiple meanings, each with its own forms and characteristics. This study uses a library research method and is qualitative in nature. The author found that As-Sa'di's method in interpreting verses containing al-ikhtilaf involves three approaches: not explaining the existence of a difference and choosing the opinion he deems correct; mentioning the difference without choosing one of the opinions; and explaining the difference, then selecting the opinion he deems correct. Meanwhile, Quraish Shihab uses two approaches: explaining the existence of a difference without choosing one of the opinions, and selecting the opinion he deems correct.

Jurnal STIU Darul HikmahVol. 11(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Al-Ikhtilaf Fi At-Tafsir: An Analysis of the Interpretations of Abdurrahman Ibn Nasir As-Sa’di and Muhammad Quraish Shihab — Muhammad Azizan Fitriana, Abdullah Abdullah, et al. · Jurnal STIU Darul Hikmah (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS