Response of an Uncased, Buried Steel Pipeline Crossing Railway Embankments at Various Crossing Angles

The growth of railways and highways has increased the number of intersections with buried pipelines, which must withstand both soil weight and live loads from passing traffic. The incidents of fire breakout and fluid leakage from carrier pipes have been witnessed at some railway embankment crossings. Although API 1102 provides design recommendations, there are still many bounding limitations in terms of the angle of crossing, burial depth, soil type, pipe diameter to thickness ratio, among others. To address some of these limitations, a numerical investigation of the behavior of uncased buried pipelines has been conducted. The results indicate that the maximum Von Mises stress in the pipeline occurs at a 90° crossing angle (at crown position). While the circumferential stress has less variation, the longitudinal stress increases as the crossing angle decrease from 90° to 0°. The observed longitudinal stiffness factor is higher for the 0° crossing angle. The study also infers that the ovalization, which could lead to ring buckling of the pipe cross-section, increases with a decrease in burial depth and an increase in embankment height.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jpsea2.pseng-1828
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response of an Uncased, Buried Steel Pipeline Crossing Railway Embankments at Various Crossing Angles

Suresh R. Dash, Seth C. Reddy, T. Jothi Saravanan
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Response of an Uncased, Buried Steel Pipeline Crossing Railway Embankments at Various Crossing Angles

Suresh R. Dash, Seth C. Reddy, T. Jothi Saravanan
article en

Abstract

The growth of railways and highways has increased the number of intersections with buried pipelines, which must withstand both soil weight and live loads from passing traffic. The incidents of fire breakout and fluid leakage from carrier pipes have been witnessed at some railway embankment crossings. Although API 1102 provides design recommendations, there are still many bounding limitations in terms of the angle of crossing, burial depth, soil type, pipe diameter to thickness ratio, among others. To address some of these limitations, a numerical investigation of the behavior of uncased buried pipelines has been conducted. The results indicate that the maximum Von Mises stress in the pipeline occurs at a 90° crossing angle (at crown position). While the circumferential stress has less variation, the longitudinal stress increases as the crossing angle decrease from 90° to 0°. The observed longitudinal stiffness factor is higher for the 0° crossing angle. The study also infers that the ovalization, which could lead to ring buckling of the pipe cross-section, increases with a decrease in burial depth and an increase in embankment height.

Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and PracticeVol. 17(1)
Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Response of an Uncased, Buried Steel Pipeline Crossing Railway Embankments at Various Crossing Angles — Suresh R. Dash, Seth C. Reddy, et al. · Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS