Consumer Repair Decision‐Making: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

ABSTRACT Repair is a vital consumer behaviour necessary to extend product lifespans and to achieve a circular economy. Despite its importance, past literature reviews do not offer a comprehensive overview of consumer repair decision‐making, as they focus on the repair of specific products, multiple circular behaviours, the act of repair, or limit the review period. Given this gap, this study undertakes a systematic literature review (SLR) using the Theory‐Context‐Characteristics‐Methods (TCCM) framework and the SPAR‐4‐SLR protocol to identify 62 papers related to consumer repair decision‐making. We find that the literature is generally atheoretical. While we discover a wealth of studies identifying the factors influencing consumer repair decisions, few examine mediating or moderating variables or the outcomes of repair decisions for consumers. We synthesise the literature to propose a conceptual model of consumer repair decision‐making and outline a comprehensive future research agenda based on the TCCM framework. We find the decision to repair is negatively related to the inconvenience and cost of repair. We recommend that marketers support repair take‐back programs and that policymakers support repair hubs and Right to Repair legislation to encourage repair and promote a circular economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70127
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer Repair Decision‐Making: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

W. H. Thejani Madhuhansi, Lucie K. Ozanne
1 citations
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Environmental Sustainability in Business
2.07
article

Consumer Repair Decision‐Making: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

W. H. Thejani Madhuhansi, Lucie K. Ozanne
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Repair is a vital consumer behaviour necessary to extend product lifespans and to achieve a circular economy. Despite its importance, past literature reviews do not offer a comprehensive overview of consumer repair decision‐making, as they focus on the repair of specific products, multiple circular behaviours, the act of repair, or limit the review period. Given this gap, this study undertakes a systematic literature review (SLR) using the Theory‐Context‐Characteristics‐Methods (TCCM) framework and the SPAR‐4‐SLR protocol to identify 62 papers related to consumer repair decision‐making. We find that the literature is generally atheoretical. While we discover a wealth of studies identifying the factors influencing consumer repair decisions, few examine mediating or moderating variables or the outcomes of repair decisions for consumers. We synthesise the literature to propose a conceptual model of consumer repair decision‐making and outline a comprehensive future research agenda based on the TCCM framework. We find the decision to repair is negatively related to the inconvenience and cost of repair. We recommend that marketers support repair take‐back programs and that policymakers support repair hubs and Right to Repair legislation to encourage repair and promote a circular economy.

International Journal of Consumer StudiesVol. 49(6)
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.