Artificial Intelligence‐Based Quantification to Assess the Automatic Psoriasis Area and Severity Index

ABSTRACT Background Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting millions globally, traditionally assessed via the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Despite its widespread use, PASI suffers from subjectivity, limited sensitivity for small lesions, and high interobserver variability. Recent advances in artificial intelligence offer a promising route to overcome these limitations. Objectives This study aimed to develop and validate the Automatic Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (APASI), an AI‐driven system for rapid, objective, and standardised assessment of psoriasis severity. Methods We compiled the Legit.Health‐PsO‐PASI dataset, consisting of 2857 images spanning various disease severities and annotated by three expert dermatologists. Two deep learning modules were developed: one for lesion segmentation and another for visual sign intensity classification (erythema, induration and desquamation). Multiple encoder architectures, including ResNet, SE_ResNeXt, Xception, Inceptionv4, EfficientNet, and SegFormer, were evaluated using a five‐fold cross‐validation approach. Performance metrics included accuracy, root mean square error, intersection over union, confusion matrices and Cohen's kappa for assessing interobserver variability. Results The best‐performing model, MiT_b2, achieved human‐comparable performance, with accuracies of 60.6% for erythema, 54.3% for induration, and 61.8% for desquamation. For lesion segmentation, the Xception model outperformed expert dermatologists, achieving an intersection over union of 0.752. Conclusions APASI provides a robust AI‐driven framework for psoriasis severity assessment, delivering rapid, objective, and precise evaluations. Its integration into clinical and research workflows could enhance disease monitoring, improve treatment assessment and reduce evaluation costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JEADV Clinical Practice
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.70143
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence‐Based Quantification to Assess the Automatic Psoriasis Area and Severity Index

G. Fernández, D. Dagnino, Taig Mac Carthy, Antonio Martorell et al.
1 citations
JEADV Clinical Practice
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
0.80
article

Artificial Intelligence‐Based Quantification to Assess the Automatic Psoriasis Area and Severity Index

G. Fernández, D. Dagnino, Taig Mac Carthy, Antonio Martorell, Pedro Gómez Tejerina, Alfonso Medela, Andy Aguilar, Gastón Roustán
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting millions globally, traditionally assessed via the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Despite its widespread use, PASI suffers from subjectivity, limited sensitivity for small lesions, and high interobserver variability. Recent advances in artificial intelligence offer a promising route to overcome these limitations. Objectives This study aimed to develop and validate the Automatic Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (APASI), an AI‐driven system for rapid, objective, and standardised assessment of psoriasis severity. Methods We compiled the Legit.Health‐PsO‐PASI dataset, consisting of 2857 images spanning various disease severities and annotated by three expert dermatologists. Two deep learning modules were developed: one for lesion segmentation and another for visual sign intensity classification (erythema, induration and desquamation). Multiple encoder architectures, including ResNet, SE_ResNeXt, Xception, Inceptionv4, EfficientNet, and SegFormer, were evaluated using a five‐fold cross‐validation approach. Performance metrics included accuracy, root mean square error, intersection over union, confusion matrices and Cohen's kappa for assessing interobserver variability. Results The best‐performing model, MiT_b2, achieved human‐comparable performance, with accuracies of 60.6% for erythema, 54.3% for induration, and 61.8% for desquamation. For lesion segmentation, the Xception model outperformed expert dermatologists, achieving an intersection over union of 0.752. Conclusions APASI provides a robust AI‐driven framework for psoriasis severity assessment, delivering rapid, objective, and precise evaluations. Its integration into clinical and research workflows could enhance disease monitoring, improve treatment assessment and reduce evaluation costs.

JEADV Clinical PracticeVol. 5(1)
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES), Healthpoint (AE), Combat Medical (Spain) (ES), Hospital de Manises (ES)
European Commission, Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.