Challenging the Database: Day-of-Analysis Calibration and UF Modeling for Reliable RRF Use in Medical Device Chemical Characterization

Accurate quantitation during chemical characterization─also referred to as extractables and leachables (E&L)─within a toxicological risk assessment for medical device biocompatibility hinges on the appropriate application of relative response factors (RRFs). This study investigates the variability of RRFs across a chemically diverse set of compounds and evaluates the implications of quantitation model selection on analytical outcomes. Using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), we demonstrate that RRFs are highly context-dependent and influenced by factors such as ionization mode, compound class, concentration, and instrument conditions. We propose an approach to RRF determination, emphasizing day-of-analysis calibration and uncertainty factor modeling to improve reproducibility. Our findings support a statistically grounded application of analytical evaluation thresholds, enhancing the reliability of semiquantitative assessments in medical device biocompatibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c04247
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenging the Database: Day-of-Analysis Calibration and UF Modeling for Reliable RRF Use in Medical Device Chemical Characterization

Jacob E. Ricker, Prakash Poudel, Nuwan Kothalawala, Michael Rush et al.
Analytical Chemistry
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

Challenging the Database: Day-of-Analysis Calibration and UF Modeling for Reliable RRF Use in Medical Device Chemical Characterization

Jacob E. Ricker, Prakash Poudel, Nuwan Kothalawala, Michael Rush, Cary Watterson, Dmitriy Pastarnak
article en

Abstract

Accurate quantitation during chemical characterization─also referred to as extractables and leachables (E&L)─within a toxicological risk assessment for medical device biocompatibility hinges on the appropriate application of relative response factors (RRFs). This study investigates the variability of RRFs across a chemically diverse set of compounds and evaluates the implications of quantitation model selection on analytical outcomes. Using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), we demonstrate that RRFs are highly context-dependent and influenced by factors such as ionization mode, compound class, concentration, and instrument conditions. We propose an approach to RRF determination, emphasizing day-of-analysis calibration and uncertainty factor modeling to improve reproducibility. Our findings support a statistically grounded application of analytical evaluation thresholds, enhancing the reliability of semiquantitative assessments in medical device biocompatibility.

Analytical ChemistryVol. 97(41)
Edwards Lifesciences (United States) (US), Edwards Lifesciences (Switzerland) (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Challenging the Database: Day-of-Analysis Calibration and UF Modeling for Reliable RRF Use in Medical Device Chemical Characterization — Jacob E. Ricker, Prakash Poudel, et al. · Analytical Chemistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS