BEYOND MERITOCRACY IN THE DIGITAL AGE: EVOLVING BIAS AWARENESS AND WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP IN HIGH-TECH. INSIGHTS FROM A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE BIAS AWARENESS IN HIGH-TECH LEADERSHIP

This paper explores how women’s leadership aspirations and experiences are shaped by an enduring yet often illusory belief in meritocracy, particularly within high-tech sectors that pride themselves on innovation and data-driven decision making. Drawing on contemporary research (Eagly & Heilman, 2016; Ibarra, Ely & Kolb, 2013; Derks et al., 2016; Rudman & Fairchild, 2004; Fine, 2005; Brescoll, 2016; Hewlett, 2019; Joshi et al., 2015; Cech & Blair-Loy, 2010; Seron et al., 2018), we illustrate how deeply held individualistic and meritocratic ideologies can mask or justify pervasive gender biases in recruitment, promotion, and leadership evaluations. Even as technology-driven businesses advocate a boundary-breaking ethos, women still confront micro-inequities, subtle exclusion from networks, and a “diversity–quality” tradeoff narrative that keeps them on the margins. Through an analysis of content diaries and interview excerpts, the paper shows that women often internalize, rationalize, or minimize inequitable treatment, partly due to cultural norms elevating technical prowess and dismissing socially oriented skills. Moreover, rather than galvanizing collective reform efforts or feminist critiques, many women’s recognition of bias remains fragmented and personalized – an obstacle to broader organizational change. In light of Industry 4.0 transformations – encompassing digital platforms, algorithmic decision making, and disruptive business models – this study urges reevaluations of workplace cultures that unquestioningly assume neutrality. We propose that addressing gender imbalance requires not only boosting women’s participation in data-driven leadership but, more importantly, rethinking how digital-era “meritocracy” can inadvertently replicate old hierarchies. By questioning the assumption that pure technical capability alone ensures fairness, leaders and organizations can generate more inclusive cultures and move toward genuinely transformative practices in the digital age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Administration Research
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47743/ejpar.2025-5-3
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BEYOND MERITOCRACY IN THE DIGITAL AGE: EVOLVING BIAS AWARENESS AND WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP IN HIGH-TECH. INSIGHTS FROM A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE BIAS AWARENESS IN HIGH-TECH LEADERSHIP

ZEALA PINTO
European Journal of Public Administration Research
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

BEYOND MERITOCRACY IN THE DIGITAL AGE: EVOLVING BIAS AWARENESS AND WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP IN HIGH-TECH. INSIGHTS FROM A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE BIAS AWARENESS IN HIGH-TECH LEADERSHIP

ZEALA PINTO
article en

Abstract

This paper explores how women’s leadership aspirations and experiences are shaped by an enduring yet often illusory belief in meritocracy, particularly within high-tech sectors that pride themselves on innovation and data-driven decision making. Drawing on contemporary research (Eagly & Heilman, 2016; Ibarra, Ely & Kolb, 2013; Derks et al., 2016; Rudman & Fairchild, 2004; Fine, 2005; Brescoll, 2016; Hewlett, 2019; Joshi et al., 2015; Cech & Blair-Loy, 2010; Seron et al., 2018), we illustrate how deeply held individualistic and meritocratic ideologies can mask or justify pervasive gender biases in recruitment, promotion, and leadership evaluations. Even as technology-driven businesses advocate a boundary-breaking ethos, women still confront micro-inequities, subtle exclusion from networks, and a “diversity–quality” tradeoff narrative that keeps them on the margins. Through an analysis of content diaries and interview excerpts, the paper shows that women often internalize, rationalize, or minimize inequitable treatment, partly due to cultural norms elevating technical prowess and dismissing socially oriented skills. Moreover, rather than galvanizing collective reform efforts or feminist critiques, many women’s recognition of bias remains fragmented and personalized – an obstacle to broader organizational change. In light of Industry 4.0 transformations – encompassing digital platforms, algorithmic decision making, and disruptive business models – this study urges reevaluations of workplace cultures that unquestioningly assume neutrality. We propose that addressing gender imbalance requires not only boosting women’s participation in data-driven leadership but, more importantly, rethinking how digital-era “meritocracy” can inadvertently replicate old hierarchies. By questioning the assumption that pure technical capability alone ensures fairness, leaders and organizations can generate more inclusive cultures and move toward genuinely transformative practices in the digital age.

European Journal of Public Administration Research(5)
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO), "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" Iasi University of Life Sciences (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.