Supplementary comparison of gas provers in the gas flow range 0.25 m<sup>3</sup>/h to 25 m<sup>3</sup>/h

Main text This report presents the results of an inter-laboratory comparison organized in order to determine the degrees of equivalence of bell and piston prover standards in the gas flow range 0.25 m 3 /h to 25 m 3 /h. The objective of the comparison was to support and prove the Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMC) in gas flow of the participating NMIs: BEV (Austria), METAS (Switzerland), GUM (Poland) and INRIM (Italy). The comparison was organized and evaluated by BEV as pilot laboratory. METAS provided the transfer standard a TRIPLE rotary meter G16 and performed the first and last measurement of the loop. The results of the calibrations were used to determination the key comparison reference value (KCRV) and its uncertainty. The reference value was determined at each flow separately following procedure A presented by M G Cox. The degrees of equivalence with the KCRV were calculated. The comparison shows very good agreement between the testing facilities. Only one setup failed the consistence test at three flow rates and had one comparison result in the "warning level". To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrologia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/62/1a/07025
Primary Topic
Advanced Sensor Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supplementary comparison of gas provers in the gas flow range 0.25 m3/h to 25 m3/h

Pier Giorgio Spazzini, Claudia Berkmann, M. A. de Huu, Arkadiusz Zadworny
Metrologia
Advanced Sensor Technologies Research
article

Supplementary comparison of gas provers in the gas flow range 0.25 m3/h to 25 m3/h

Pier Giorgio Spazzini, Claudia Berkmann, M. A. de Huu, Arkadiusz Zadworny
article en

Abstract

Main text This report presents the results of an inter-laboratory comparison organized in order to determine the degrees of equivalence of bell and piston prover standards in the gas flow range 0.25 m 3 /h to 25 m 3 /h. The objective of the comparison was to support and prove the Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMC) in gas flow of the participating NMIs: BEV (Austria), METAS (Switzerland), GUM (Poland) and INRIM (Italy). The comparison was organized and evaluated by BEV as pilot laboratory. METAS provided the transfer standard a TRIPLE rotary meter G16 and performed the first and last measurement of the loop. The results of the calibrations were used to determination the key comparison reference value (KCRV) and its uncertainty. The reference value was determined at each flow separately following procedure A presented by M G Cox. The degrees of equivalence with the KCRV were calculated. The comparison shows very good agreement between the testing facilities. Only one setup failed the consistence test at three flow rates and had one comparison result in the "warning level". To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

MetrologiaVol. 62(1A)
Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (AT), Swiss Federal Institute of Metrology (CH), Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (IT), Central Office of Measures (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Advanced Sensor Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Supplementary comparison of gas provers in the gas flow range 0.25 m<sup>3</sup>/h to 25 m<sup>3</sup>/h — Pier Giorgio Spazzini, Claudia Berkmann, et al. · Metrologia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS