Lone pair <i>versus</i> aromatic interactions on metal oxide surfaces: a combined spectroscopic and computational study

This study provides strong evidence that lone pair interactions dominate over aromaticity in binding to metal oxide surfaces, in sharp contrast to their behaviour on pure metal surfaces. Our earlier work showed that lone pairs and aromatic groups act synergistically in organic molecules interacting with metal surfaces. Here, we demonstrate that on metal oxides, the situation is reversed: lone pair interactions are significantly stronger than those of aromatic bonds, and when both are present, aromatic groups actually reduce the overall interaction strength. This finding highlights a fundamental shift in binding mechanisms when moving from metals to metal oxides. Fluorescence spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering (DLS) consistently confirm this trend, also revealing a rare correlation between the two techniques. To probe these effects, we studied four isoxazole derivatives containing lone pair and aromatic functionalities on zinc oxide nanoparticles as a representative metal oxide surface. The results show that variations in functional groups do not significantly alter binding as long as lone pairs are present, indicating that the lone pair itself, rather than the attached group, is the key determinant of interaction. This challenges the conventional strategy of optimizing functional groups for surface binding and instead emphasizes the primary role of electronic properties. Such insights open new opportunities for the rational design of molecules that can interact more effectively with metal oxides, with implications for catalysis, sensors, corrosion resistance, and environmental applications. The novelty of this work also lies in combining experimental and computational approaches. Binding of isoxazoles with ZnO nanoparticles was also validated through density functional theory (DFT) calculations, including frontier molecular orbital (FMO), non-covalent interaction (NCI), and density of states (DOS) analyses. These computational results confirmed the dominant role of lone pairs and supported the experimental findings. Overall, this study advances the fundamental understanding of molecular adsorption on metal oxide surfaces. By revealing that lone pair-Zn<sup>2+</sup> interactions outweigh π-conjugated systems and that aromatic groups may even hinder binding, it provides crucial guidance for tailoring surface-active molecules. This dual experimental-computational approach establishes a framework for designing next-generation functional materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dalton Transactions
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5dt02125a
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lone pair versus aromatic interactions on metal oxide surfaces: a combined spectroscopic and computational study

Ahson Jabbar Shaikh, Syed Majid Bukhari, Umar Farooq, Afia Saleem et al.
2 citations
Dalton Transactions
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
2.49
article

Lone pair versus aromatic interactions on metal oxide surfaces: a combined spectroscopic and computational study

Ahson Jabbar Shaikh, Syed Majid Bukhari, Umar Farooq, Afia Saleem, Hamza Khan, Lotfi Ben Tahar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study provides strong evidence that lone pair interactions dominate over aromaticity in binding to metal oxide surfaces, in sharp contrast to their behaviour on pure metal surfaces. Our earlier work showed that lone pairs and aromatic groups act synergistically in organic molecules interacting with metal surfaces. Here, we demonstrate that on metal oxides, the situation is reversed: lone pair interactions are significantly stronger than those of aromatic bonds, and when both are present, aromatic groups actually reduce the overall interaction strength. This finding highlights a fundamental shift in binding mechanisms when moving from metals to metal oxides. Fluorescence spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering (DLS) consistently confirm this trend, also revealing a rare correlation between the two techniques. To probe these effects, we studied four isoxazole derivatives containing lone pair and aromatic functionalities on zinc oxide nanoparticles as a representative metal oxide surface. The results show that variations in functional groups do not significantly alter binding as long as lone pairs are present, indicating that the lone pair itself, rather than the attached group, is the key determinant of interaction. This challenges the conventional strategy of optimizing functional groups for surface binding and instead emphasizes the primary role of electronic properties. Such insights open new opportunities for the rational design of molecules that can interact more effectively with metal oxides, with implications for catalysis, sensors, corrosion resistance, and environmental applications. The novelty of this work also lies in combining experimental and computational approaches. Binding of isoxazoles with ZnO nanoparticles was also validated through density functional theory (DFT) calculations, including frontier molecular orbital (FMO), non-covalent interaction (NCI), and density of states (DOS) analyses. These computational results confirmed the dominant role of lone pairs and supported the experimental findings. Overall, this study advances the fundamental understanding of molecular adsorption on metal oxide surfaces. By revealing that lone pair-Zn<sup>2+</sup> interactions outweigh π-conjugated systems and that aromatic groups may even hinder binding, it provides crucial guidance for tailoring surface-active molecules. This dual experimental-computational approach establishes a framework for designing next-generation functional materials.

Dalton TransactionsVol. 54(44)
Northern Border University (SA), Hainan Normal University (CN), Hainan University (CN), Abbottabad University of Science and Technology (PK), Hainan Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
2.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.