The european experience in preserving linguistic diversity: implementation mechanisms and models of language policy

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the European experience in preserving linguistic diversity amid globalization, digitalization, and increasing migration. It analyzes the key mechanisms for implementing language policy in EU member states, covering legal, institutional, financial, and technological aspects. Key international legal documents that establish the framework for language policy regulation are analyzed. Special attention is given to the role of institutional mechanisms in coordinating efforts to preserve linguistic diversity. The financial mechanism is examined through tools like national content quotas, grant programs, and economic incentives for language startups. The technological mechanism is examined through the example of digital platforms such as Europeana, which accumulates cultural and linguistic heritage in a digital format. The article analyzes typical national models of language policy: the unitary model (France), the regional model (Spain), and the multilingual model (Finland). Each of these models has distinct strengths and weaknesses. France’s unitary model promotes linguistic unity and centralized governance, yet it restricts the growth of regional languages. Spain’s regional model allows regional communities to use their native languages, though it can sometimes create tension between central and regional authorities. Finland’s multilingual model promotes the equal coexistence of state languages while protecting indigenous languages through a well-developed administrative and educational infrastructure.The study explores the interconnected factors influencing the effectiveness of linguistic diversity preservation in Europe, including globalization, digitalization, migration patterns, educational approaches, and intergenerational language transmission mechanisms. These factors create a complex system of interdependencies, and neglecting any single component diminishes the overall effectiveness of language policy. The article contends that an effective language policy requires a multi-level framework, which includes legal support, institutional structures, financial investment, educational strategies, and digital innovations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Practice of Public Administration
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2025-1-06
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The european experience in preserving linguistic diversity: implementation mechanisms and models of language policy

Oleksandra Tarasenko
Theory and Practice of Public Administration
Second Language Learning and Teaching
article

The european experience in preserving linguistic diversity: implementation mechanisms and models of language policy

Oleksandra Tarasenko
article en

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the European experience in preserving linguistic diversity amid globalization, digitalization, and increasing migration. It analyzes the key mechanisms for implementing language policy in EU member states, covering legal, institutional, financial, and technological aspects. Key international legal documents that establish the framework for language policy regulation are analyzed. Special attention is given to the role of institutional mechanisms in coordinating efforts to preserve linguistic diversity. The financial mechanism is examined through tools like national content quotas, grant programs, and economic incentives for language startups. The technological mechanism is examined through the example of digital platforms such as Europeana, which accumulates cultural and linguistic heritage in a digital format. The article analyzes typical national models of language policy: the unitary model (France), the regional model (Spain), and the multilingual model (Finland). Each of these models has distinct strengths and weaknesses. France’s unitary model promotes linguistic unity and centralized governance, yet it restricts the growth of regional languages. Spain’s regional model allows regional communities to use their native languages, though it can sometimes create tension between central and regional authorities. Finland’s multilingual model promotes the equal coexistence of state languages while protecting indigenous languages through a well-developed administrative and educational infrastructure.The study explores the interconnected factors influencing the effectiveness of linguistic diversity preservation in Europe, including globalization, digitalization, migration patterns, educational approaches, and intergenerational language transmission mechanisms. These factors create a complex system of interdependencies, and neglecting any single component diminishes the overall effectiveness of language policy. The article contends that an effective language policy requires a multi-level framework, which includes legal support, institutional structures, financial investment, educational strategies, and digital innovations.

Theory and Practice of Public AdministrationVol. 1(80)
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.