The limits of accuracy of the extended Koopmans’ theorem for electron affinities

Calculations using several basis sets of increasing sizes for electron attachment to LiH show that the error is ∼0.03 electron volts for the largest basis set when comparing the extended Koopmans' theorem (EKT) with differences in full configuration interaction calculations. The corresponding error in the ionization potential is ∼10-5 electron volts. The EKT electron affinities (EAs) of a set of small molecules were examined. The Dyson orbital pole strength, the Dyson orbital compactness, and the largest square of the Dyson orbital expansion coefficients were used to analyze the accuracy of the EKT for EAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0292192
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The limits of accuracy of the extended Koopmans’ theorem for electron affinities

Robert C. Morrison
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
article

The limits of accuracy of the extended Koopmans’ theorem for electron affinities

Robert C. Morrison
article en

Abstract

Calculations using several basis sets of increasing sizes for electron attachment to LiH show that the error is ∼0.03 electron volts for the largest basis set when comparing the extended Koopmans' theorem (EKT) with differences in full configuration interaction calculations. The corresponding error in the ionization potential is ∼10-5 electron volts. The EKT electron affinities (EAs) of a set of small molecules were examined. The Dyson orbital pole strength, the Dyson orbital compactness, and the largest square of the Dyson orbital expansion coefficients were used to analyze the accuracy of the EKT for EAs.

The Journal of Chemical PhysicsVol. 163(14)
East Carolina University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.