Histological and Immunolabeling Techniques in Arabidopsis thaliana: A Practical Guide and Standardization Roadmap

Arabidopsis thaliana is a widely used model in plant biology, where histology (HT), histochemistry (HC), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and immunofluorescence (IF) are applied to study cellular structures, macromolecules, and antigens. Despite their extensive use, protocols lack standardization and exhibit substantial variability in critical aspects such as reagent handling, exposure times, and the proper use of controls. This methodological heterogeneity represents a major gap, limiting reproducibility and comparability between studies. Unlike previous methodological reviews, this work focuses exclusively on A. thaliana, systematically identifies reporting omissions, and proposes a roadmap for standardization. A narrative review of literature retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science was conducted with the aim of analyzing methodological approaches, identifying inconsistencies, and offering recommendations for improved laboratory practices. The analysis revealed frequent omissions in the reporting of critical steps such as dehydration, clearing, antigen retrieval, enzyme blocking, and the incorporation of positive and negative controls, which compromise the reliability of results and hinder inter-laboratory validation. Based on this evidence, three key recommendations are emphasized: (i) organ-specific selection and explicit justification of fixatives and stains; (ii) mandatory incorporation of positive and negative controls in IHC and IF; and (iii) adoption of a minimum reporting checklist to enhance reproducibility. Beyond cell morphology, the reviewed studies demonstrate applications in plant physiology, phytogenetics, and pathophysiology. By combining critical analysis with actionable guidelines, this review contributes a practical reference to strengthen methodological rigor in histological and immunological studies of plants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102357
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant tissue culture and regeneration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Histological and Immunolabeling Techniques in Arabidopsis thaliana: A Practical Guide and Standardization Roadmap

Ignacia Hernández, Patricia Peñaloza, Alejandra Moller, Ariadna Ayala Rubio et al.
3 citations
Agronomy
Plant tissue culture and regeneration
2.42
article

Histological and Immunolabeling Techniques in Arabidopsis thaliana: A Practical Guide and Standardization Roadmap

Ignacia Hernández, Patricia Peñaloza, Alejandra Moller, Ariadna Ayala Rubio, Javier Santa Cruz, Samuel Valdebenito, Diego Calbucheo, Camila Cáceres, Priscila Castillo, Mayra Lirayén Providell
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Arabidopsis thaliana is a widely used model in plant biology, where histology (HT), histochemistry (HC), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and immunofluorescence (IF) are applied to study cellular structures, macromolecules, and antigens. Despite their extensive use, protocols lack standardization and exhibit substantial variability in critical aspects such as reagent handling, exposure times, and the proper use of controls. This methodological heterogeneity represents a major gap, limiting reproducibility and comparability between studies. Unlike previous methodological reviews, this work focuses exclusively on A. thaliana, systematically identifies reporting omissions, and proposes a roadmap for standardization. A narrative review of literature retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science was conducted with the aim of analyzing methodological approaches, identifying inconsistencies, and offering recommendations for improved laboratory practices. The analysis revealed frequent omissions in the reporting of critical steps such as dehydration, clearing, antigen retrieval, enzyme blocking, and the incorporation of positive and negative controls, which compromise the reliability of results and hinder inter-laboratory validation. Based on this evidence, three key recommendations are emphasized: (i) organ-specific selection and explicit justification of fixatives and stains; (ii) mandatory incorporation of positive and negative controls in IHC and IF; and (iii) adoption of a minimum reporting checklist to enhance reproducibility. Beyond cell morphology, the reviewed studies demonstrate applications in plant physiology, phytogenetics, and pathophysiology. By combining critical analysis with actionable guidelines, this review contributes a practical reference to strengthen methodological rigor in histological and immunological studies of plants.

AgronomyVol. 15(10)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL), Austral University of Chile (CL), University of Concepción (CL), Viña del Mar University (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Plant tissue culture and regeneration
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.