Dynamics of nitrogen and mineralization pattern in modified Amrashakti

An experiment entitled “Dynamics of nitrogen and Mineralization Pattern in Modified Amrashakti” was undertaken at Department of soil science and agricultural chemistry, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Dist. Ratnagiri during 2024-25 in Randomized Block Design. This study aimed to evaluate the nutrient stability and mineralization behaviour of nitrogen fractions (amide nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen) in modified Amrashakti Multinutrient solution during six months of storage. Three solutions viz., T1 @ 0.5% (Urea, SOP, SSP each) + 0.25 % (ZnSO4, Borax, CuSO4 each) + 0.01% (sodium molybdate), T2 @ 0.5% (Urea, SOP, each) + 0.15% (Orthophosphate Phosphoric acid) +0.25 % (ZnSO4, Borax, CuSO4 each) + 0.0075% (Ammonium molybdate) and T3 @ 1% (calcium nitrate) + 0.1% (phosphoric acid) + 0.55% (potassium nitrate) + 0.25% (ZnSO4, Borax, CuSO4 each) + 0.0075% (Ammonium molybdate) with varying pH levels were formulated using different NPK and micronutrient sources. Monthly analysis of nitrogen (amide, ammoniacal, nitrate) by standardised methodology. Based on the mineralization behavior and nutrient fractionation observed over the six-month storage period. Solution T2 consistently outperformed T1 and T3 in terms of nutrient stability, solubility, and availability. T2 maintained higher levels of available nitrogen (through balanced amide to nitrate conversion), Minimal precipitation and better compatibility of nutrient sources in T2 contributed to its superior performance. Decline in amide nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in solutions were observed in second month. Therefore, it may be concluded that Solution T2 is the most effective formulation among the three, particularly in maintaining nutrient availability and solution stability, and is best recommended for use within two months of preparation for optimal efficiency. Results indicated a decline in pH and EC, accompanied by nutrient losses over time. T2 with acidic pH, showed better nutrient stability and solubility, while T1 recorded greater precipitation and nutrient decline. The findings suggest that the modified Amrashakti Multinutrient solution (T2) i.e., @ 0.5% (Urea, SOP, each) + 0.15% (Orthophosphate Phosphoric acid) +0.25 % (ZnSO4, Borax, CuSO4 each) + 0.0075% (Ammonium molybdate) might be most effective within two months of preparation, beyond which nutrient degradation may impact efficacy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26646781.2025.v7.i10a.314
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of nitrogen and mineralization pattern in modified Amrashakti

MC Kasture, More SS, Ingle PJ, Deshmukh SV et al.
International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Dynamics of nitrogen and mineralization pattern in modified Amrashakti

MC Kasture, More SS, Ingle PJ, Deshmukh SV, Bansode PB
article en

Abstract

An experiment entitled “Dynamics of nitrogen and Mineralization Pattern in Modified Amrashakti” was undertaken at Department of soil science and agricultural chemistry, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Dist. Ratnagiri during 2024-25 in Randomized Block Design. This study aimed to evaluate the nutrient stability and mineralization behaviour of nitrogen fractions (amide nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen) in modified Amrashakti Multinutrient solution during six months of storage. Three solutions viz., T1 @ 0.5% (Urea, SOP, SSP each) + 0.25 % (ZnSO4, Borax, CuSO4 each) + 0.01% (sodium molybdate), T2 @ 0.5% (Urea, SOP, each) + 0.15% (Orthophosphate Phosphoric acid) +0.25 % (ZnSO4, Borax, CuSO4 each) + 0.0075% (Ammonium molybdate) and T3 @ 1% (calcium nitrate) + 0.1% (phosphoric acid) + 0.55% (potassium nitrate) + 0.25% (ZnSO4, Borax, CuSO4 each) + 0.0075% (Ammonium molybdate) with varying pH levels were formulated using different NPK and micronutrient sources. Monthly analysis of nitrogen (amide, ammoniacal, nitrate) by standardised methodology. Based on the mineralization behavior and nutrient fractionation observed over the six-month storage period. Solution T2 consistently outperformed T1 and T3 in terms of nutrient stability, solubility, and availability. T2 maintained higher levels of available nitrogen (through balanced amide to nitrate conversion), Minimal precipitation and better compatibility of nutrient sources in T2 contributed to its superior performance. Decline in amide nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in solutions were observed in second month. Therefore, it may be concluded that Solution T2 is the most effective formulation among the three, particularly in maintaining nutrient availability and solution stability, and is best recommended for use within two months of preparation for optimal efficiency. Results indicated a decline in pH and EC, accompanied by nutrient losses over time. T2 with acidic pH, showed better nutrient stability and solubility, while T1 recorded greater precipitation and nutrient decline. The findings suggest that the modified Amrashakti Multinutrient solution (T2) i.e., @ 0.5% (Urea, SOP, each) + 0.15% (Orthophosphate Phosphoric acid) +0.25 % (ZnSO4, Borax, CuSO4 each) + 0.0075% (Ammonium molybdate) might be most effective within two months of preparation, beyond which nutrient degradation may impact efficacy.

International Journal of Advanced Chemistry ResearchVol. 7(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.