Trust Under Bounded Rationality: Exploring Human-AI Interaction in Decision-Making Through Large Language Models

This study investigates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) within Simon’s bounded rationality framework, focusing on factors such as preferences, competence, learning, and persuasion that influence decision-makers’ trust in AI outcomes. Data were collected using mixed methods, including surveys and interviews, followed by descriptive and thematic analyses to explore the trust dynamics in human-AI interactions under bounded rationality. Participants highlighted the effectiveness of AI systems in decision-making constrained by bounded rationality and discussed how AI systems might mitigate these limitations. The findings emphasize the critical role of trust in facilitating effective human-AI interactions, indicating that AI-provided explanations not only support decision-making but also enhance users’ trust in these systems. This study identifies trust as a multifaceted and dynamic aspect of human-AI interactions, suggesting that AI developers can improve trustworthiness through transparency, demonstrated competence, and continuous learning. Enhancing these factors is expected to drive widespread adoption and improve the overall user experience with AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251380135
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust Under Bounded Rationality: Exploring Human-AI Interaction in Decision-Making Through Large Language Models

Ibrahim Almatrodi, Waleed Almutairi
SAGE Open
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Trust Under Bounded Rationality: Exploring Human-AI Interaction in Decision-Making Through Large Language Models

Ibrahim Almatrodi, Waleed Almutairi
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) within Simon’s bounded rationality framework, focusing on factors such as preferences, competence, learning, and persuasion that influence decision-makers’ trust in AI outcomes. Data were collected using mixed methods, including surveys and interviews, followed by descriptive and thematic analyses to explore the trust dynamics in human-AI interactions under bounded rationality. Participants highlighted the effectiveness of AI systems in decision-making constrained by bounded rationality and discussed how AI systems might mitigate these limitations. The findings emphasize the critical role of trust in facilitating effective human-AI interactions, indicating that AI-provided explanations not only support decision-making but also enhance users’ trust in these systems. This study identifies trust as a multifaceted and dynamic aspect of human-AI interactions, suggesting that AI developers can improve trustworthiness through transparency, demonstrated competence, and continuous learning. Enhancing these factors is expected to drive widespread adoption and improve the overall user experience with AI systems.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(4)
King Saud University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.