Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wild amphibians: a call for more research

Amphibians serve a central role in food webs and provide a link between aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Because of their dependence on water, amphibians are susceptible to legacy and emerging contaminants. We investigated mercury (Hg) and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) concentrations in wild populations of two amphibian species-the green frog (Lithobates clamitans) and the American toad (Anaxyrus americanus)-which exhibit different life histories. We evaluated whether proximity to PFAS point source (State Superfund site) affected PFAS exposures in amphibians and assessed length, mass, sex, diet, and trophic position as predictors of contaminant concentrations. We found higher Hg concentrations in the more aquatic species (i.e., green frog) but higher PFAS concentrations (summed PFAS, perfluorodecanoic acid [PFDA], perfluoroundecanoic acid [PFUnA], perfluorododecanoic acid [PFDoA], perfluorotridecanoic acid [PFTrDA], and perfluorotetradecanoic acid [PFTeDA]) in the more terrestrial species (i.e., American toad). Proximity to the PFAS State Superfund site did not strongly affect PFAS exposures in amphibians. Of the biological predictors tested, diet best explained PFAS concentrations, but other factors (e.g., physiological differences) are likely contributing to the difference in PFAS bioaccumulation between aquatic and terrestrial species. Only three reports on PFAS concentrations in wild amphibians exist, all from contaminated sites in China, reporting much higher concentrations than found here. Additionally, experimental exposure studies have only investigated the effects of exposure to a few PFAS compounds, of which long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids detected here (PFDA, PDUnA, PFDoA, PFTrDA, and PFTeDA) are not represented in the literature. To truly understand the effects that detectable PFAS impose on wild amphibians, research is needed on the effects of more PFAS compounds, bioaccumulation in larval and terrestrial amphibians, and the elimination of PFAS via their skin to different media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf249
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wild amphibians: a call for more research

N. Roxanna Razavi, Eric Levanduski, Sujan Fernando, J Tennant et al.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
article

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wild amphibians: a call for more research

N. Roxanna Razavi, Eric Levanduski, Sujan Fernando, J Tennant, Sydney L Burgy
article en

Abstract

Amphibians serve a central role in food webs and provide a link between aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Because of their dependence on water, amphibians are susceptible to legacy and emerging contaminants. We investigated mercury (Hg) and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) concentrations in wild populations of two amphibian species-the green frog (Lithobates clamitans) and the American toad (Anaxyrus americanus)-which exhibit different life histories. We evaluated whether proximity to PFAS point source (State Superfund site) affected PFAS exposures in amphibians and assessed length, mass, sex, diet, and trophic position as predictors of contaminant concentrations. We found higher Hg concentrations in the more aquatic species (i.e., green frog) but higher PFAS concentrations (summed PFAS, perfluorodecanoic acid [PFDA], perfluoroundecanoic acid [PFUnA], perfluorododecanoic acid [PFDoA], perfluorotridecanoic acid [PFTrDA], and perfluorotetradecanoic acid [PFTeDA]) in the more terrestrial species (i.e., American toad). Proximity to the PFAS State Superfund site did not strongly affect PFAS exposures in amphibians. Of the biological predictors tested, diet best explained PFAS concentrations, but other factors (e.g., physiological differences) are likely contributing to the difference in PFAS bioaccumulation between aquatic and terrestrial species. Only three reports on PFAS concentrations in wild amphibians exist, all from contaminated sites in China, reporting much higher concentrations than found here. Additionally, experimental exposure studies have only investigated the effects of exposure to a few PFAS compounds, of which long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids detected here (PFDA, PDUnA, PFDoA, PFTrDA, and PFTeDA) are not represented in the literature. To truly understand the effects that detectable PFAS impose on wild amphibians, research is needed on the effects of more PFAS compounds, bioaccumulation in larval and terrestrial amphibians, and the elimination of PFAS via their skin to different media.

Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryVol. 45(1)
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US), University of Georgia (US), Clarkson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.