8292222 A randomized controlled trial on effectiveness of an enhanced educational intervention on reducing breakthrough infection and mental health problems in Chinese non-healthcare workers

<h3>Background</h3> Despite vaccination and booster shots proving more effective than workplace measures in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, hesitancy towards compulsory booster shots remains. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced educational intervention program in improving the acceptance of COVID-19 booster shots and reducing breakthrough infections among non-healthcare workers in Hong Kong. <h3>Methods</h3> In this 9-month randomized controlled trial (RCT), workers were randomly allocated to either the intervention or control group. The intervention group received educational sessions at baseline and at 3- month, covering general health and evidence-based information on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines and booster shots. The control group received only general health information. All participants were followed up for an additional 6 months. The primary outcomes were intention and acceptance of booster shots, as well as breakthrough infections. The DASS-21 scale was used to evaluate participants’ mental health status, and two-way mixed ANOVA to analyze the group effect. A difference of ≥ 5% in booster uptake between the intervention and control group indicated a practical significance in infection control. <h3>Results</h3> Among 310 consenting workers, 282 (91.0%) of them completed the trial. At recruitment, the booster uptake rate was similar between the intervention and control groups (62.0% vs. 62.1%). After the educational intervention sessions, the intervention group showed a higher booster uptake rate (76.1% vs. 67.9%). A lower rate of breakthrough infection was observed in the intervention group during the latest follow-up period (23.2% vs. 29.5%); however, no change in the intention to get booster shots were recorded for all subjects. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This enhanced educational intervention program significantly improves booster uptake rates and reduces COVID-19 breakthrough infection rates among non-healthcare workers. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT05197673). (Funding: HMRF Ref.: COVID190104, COVID1903008, and 18190471).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-epicohabstracts.246
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8292222 A randomized controlled trial on effectiveness of an enhanced educational intervention on reducing breakthrough infection and mental health problems in Chinese non-healthcare workers

Lap Ah Tse, Feng Wang, Samuel Yeung Shan Wong, Kin‐Fai Ho et al.
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

8292222 A randomized controlled trial on effectiveness of an enhanced educational intervention on reducing breakthrough infection and mental health problems in Chinese non-healthcare workers

Lap Ah Tse, Feng Wang, Samuel Yeung Shan Wong, Kin‐Fai Ho, Phoenix K. H. Mo, Dong Dong, Chidan Wan
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Despite vaccination and booster shots proving more effective than workplace measures in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, hesitancy towards compulsory booster shots remains. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced educational intervention program in improving the acceptance of COVID-19 booster shots and reducing breakthrough infections among non-healthcare workers in Hong Kong. <h3>Methods</h3> In this 9-month randomized controlled trial (RCT), workers were randomly allocated to either the intervention or control group. The intervention group received educational sessions at baseline and at 3- month, covering general health and evidence-based information on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines and booster shots. The control group received only general health information. All participants were followed up for an additional 6 months. The primary outcomes were intention and acceptance of booster shots, as well as breakthrough infections. The DASS-21 scale was used to evaluate participants’ mental health status, and two-way mixed ANOVA to analyze the group effect. A difference of ≥ 5% in booster uptake between the intervention and control group indicated a practical significance in infection control. <h3>Results</h3> Among 310 consenting workers, 282 (91.0%) of them completed the trial. At recruitment, the booster uptake rate was similar between the intervention and control groups (62.0% vs. 62.1%). After the educational intervention sessions, the intervention group showed a higher booster uptake rate (76.1% vs. 67.9%). A lower rate of breakthrough infection was observed in the intervention group during the latest follow-up period (23.2% vs. 29.5%); however, no change in the intention to get booster shots were recorded for all subjects. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This enhanced educational intervention program significantly improves booster uptake rates and reduces COVID-19 breakthrough infection rates among non-healthcare workers. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT05197673). (Funding: HMRF Ref.: COVID190104, COVID1903008, and 18190471).

Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.