8219149 Exposure to Ionizing Radiation and Site-Specific Cancer Risks in Nuclear Power Plant Workers: Findings from an Updated Record Linkage of the Canadian National Dose Registry

<h3>Objective</h3> Ionizing radiation is a human carcinogen, but there are uncertainties about cancer risks from long-term exposure at low-doses. Large-scale occupational studies provide opportunities to estimate these risks, yet to date, most have relied on mortality outcomes to do so. This study sought to characterize the risk of incident cancers in relation to cumulative occupational exposure to radiation among nuclear power plant workers in the recently extended follow-up of the Canadian National Dose Registry. <h3>Methods</h3> This retrospective cohort study comprised 75,350 Canadians employed between 1945 and 2010. Record linkage to national cancer incidence and mortality registries was performed to identify incident cancers between 1969 and 2010. Annual whole-body doses to internal and external ionizing radiation, expressed as effective doses, were determined from personal dosimetry records. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare site-specific cancer rates with the Canadian general population, while Poisson regression models estimated linear excess relative risks (ERR) per 100 millisieverts (mSv) of cumulative exposure. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 4,370 first primary cancers were identified during the follow-up. The mean cumulative effective dose was 12.0 mSv (SD = 30.42 mSv) at the end of follow-up. Elevated SIRs were observed for malignant melanoma, prostate, and colon cancer, while that for lung cancer incidence was less than one. The ERR estimates were positive, though not statistically significant, for prostate cancer (ERR/100mSv = 0.12; 95% CI: -0.05, 0.29) and melanoma (ERR/100mSv = 0.32; 95% CI: -0.23, 0.87), whereas an inverse association was exhibited for lung cancer. For prostate cancer, age at first exposure was found to modify the risk, with those first exposed from 55 years of age onwards most vulnerable. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our findings provide some evidence that low-dose protracted ionizing radiation exposure increases the risk of prostate cancer and malignant melanoma. <h3>Funding</h3> This project was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding Application #: 487910).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-epicohabstracts.356
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8219149 Exposure to Ionizing Radiation and Site-Specific Cancer Risks in Nuclear Power Plant Workers: Findings from an Updated Record Linkage of the Canadian National Dose Registry

Paul J. Villeneuve, Lydia B. Zablotska, Patrick Hinton, Tim Prendergast et al.
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

8219149 Exposure to Ionizing Radiation and Site-Specific Cancer Risks in Nuclear Power Plant Workers: Findings from an Updated Record Linkage of the Canadian National Dose Registry

Paul J. Villeneuve, Lydia B. Zablotska, Patrick Hinton, Tim Prendergast, Cheryl Peters, T. Minh, Laura Andrea Rodríguez-Villamizar, Paul A. Demers, Philippe Prince
article en

Abstract

<h3>Objective</h3> Ionizing radiation is a human carcinogen, but there are uncertainties about cancer risks from long-term exposure at low-doses. Large-scale occupational studies provide opportunities to estimate these risks, yet to date, most have relied on mortality outcomes to do so. This study sought to characterize the risk of incident cancers in relation to cumulative occupational exposure to radiation among nuclear power plant workers in the recently extended follow-up of the Canadian National Dose Registry. <h3>Methods</h3> This retrospective cohort study comprised 75,350 Canadians employed between 1945 and 2010. Record linkage to national cancer incidence and mortality registries was performed to identify incident cancers between 1969 and 2010. Annual whole-body doses to internal and external ionizing radiation, expressed as effective doses, were determined from personal dosimetry records. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare site-specific cancer rates with the Canadian general population, while Poisson regression models estimated linear excess relative risks (ERR) per 100 millisieverts (mSv) of cumulative exposure. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 4,370 first primary cancers were identified during the follow-up. The mean cumulative effective dose was 12.0 mSv (SD = 30.42 mSv) at the end of follow-up. Elevated SIRs were observed for malignant melanoma, prostate, and colon cancer, while that for lung cancer incidence was less than one. The ERR estimates were positive, though not statistically significant, for prostate cancer (ERR/100mSv = 0.12; 95% CI: -0.05, 0.29) and melanoma (ERR/100mSv = 0.32; 95% CI: -0.23, 0.87), whereas an inverse association was exhibited for lung cancer. For prostate cancer, age at first exposure was found to modify the risk, with those first exposed from 55 years of age onwards most vulnerable. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our findings provide some evidence that low-dose protracted ionizing radiation exposure increases the risk of prostate cancer and malignant melanoma. <h3>Funding</h3> This project was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding Application #: 487910).

Public Health Ontario (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.