Healthcare providers’ perceptions on facility-based screening for intimate partner violence: a multi-center qualitative formative research at assisted reproductive technology clinics

To explore acceptable strategies and feasibility of intimate partner violence (IPV) screening at assisted reproductive technology (ART) hospitals, from the perspective of healthcare providers. Drawing on programmatic qualitative research design, this study used in-depth interviews to elicit experiences and opinions of clinicians who provided ART services in selected hospitals in Beijing, Anhui Province, Guangdong Province, and Ningxia Hui Autonomous Reigion. A total of 14 ART doctors and nurses joined our study. We found that clinicians encountered suspected cases of IPV victimization and that several reported having applied strategies to identify IPV in medical practice. Acceptable strategies mentioned by clinicians include identifying key patients of concern during ART service delivery, and thereafter following up with case management. Most healthcare providers mentioned that challenges to IPV screening at ART clinics would include its incompatibility between clinical workflow, clinic venue-specific disadvantages for routinized IPV screening, and limited capacity of the healthcare workforce to respond to IPV. Healthcare providers at ART clinics have commonly encountered infertility patients who fell victim to IPV. Screening for IPV is deemed possible only if risk stratification is implemented. Several health system-level challenges should be addressed to mobilize and incentive healthcare providers to engage more with IPV screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13362-9
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare providers’ perceptions on facility-based screening for intimate partner violence: a multi-center qualitative formative research at assisted reproductive technology clinics

Han Hu, Fan Yang, Xinchen Li, Yu Fu et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Healthcare providers’ perceptions on facility-based screening for intimate partner violence: a multi-center qualitative formative research at assisted reproductive technology clinics

Han Hu, Fan Yang, Xinchen Li, Yu Fu, Yuanyuan Wang, Xiangyu Sun
article en

Abstract

To explore acceptable strategies and feasibility of intimate partner violence (IPV) screening at assisted reproductive technology (ART) hospitals, from the perspective of healthcare providers. Drawing on programmatic qualitative research design, this study used in-depth interviews to elicit experiences and opinions of clinicians who provided ART services in selected hospitals in Beijing, Anhui Province, Guangdong Province, and Ningxia Hui Autonomous Reigion. A total of 14 ART doctors and nurses joined our study. We found that clinicians encountered suspected cases of IPV victimization and that several reported having applied strategies to identify IPV in medical practice. Acceptable strategies mentioned by clinicians include identifying key patients of concern during ART service delivery, and thereafter following up with case management. Most healthcare providers mentioned that challenges to IPV screening at ART clinics would include its incompatibility between clinical workflow, clinic venue-specific disadvantages for routinized IPV screening, and limited capacity of the healthcare workforce to respond to IPV. Healthcare providers at ART clinics have commonly encountered infertility patients who fell victim to IPV. Screening for IPV is deemed possible only if risk stratification is implemented. Several health system-level challenges should be addressed to mobilize and incentive healthcare providers to engage more with IPV screening.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 25(1)
Peking University (CN), National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.