Analysis of the use of cluster hydraulic fracturing in low-permeability reservoirs

The article analyzes and compares the innovative method of inflow intensification with the traditional one. Cluster hydraulic fracturing is an economically viable alternative to conventional hydraulic fracturing. Instead of creating a continuous proppant bundle, it forms separate clusters of proppant in the crack, which leads to the formation of additional conductive channels and increased permeability. The main advantage is a significant reduction in costs: less proppant, fluid, and surgery time are required. The technology is based on pulsed liquid injection alternating between pure liquid and liquid with proppant, which allows the formation of an optimal cluster structure. Unlike the uniform distribution of proppant in traditional hydraulic fracturing, cluster hydraulic fracturing creates “pillars” of proppant that keep the crack open. When designing a cluster hydraulic fracturing, it is necessary to take into account the distance between clusters and the density of proppant bundles. To assess the effectiveness of the technology, the productivity coefficient was used, which was reduced to the effective thickness of the reservoir. The productivity coefficient of each well was calculated based on daily production data using the Vogel correlation (for conditions below saturation pressure). The results demonstrate that the cluster hydraulic fracturing provided stable production for two years, comparable to neighboring wells. This fact, in turn, confirms the presence of channels, since the uniform distribution of proppant usually leads to significant production losses. Based on the analysis and the results obtained, cluster hydraulic fracturing appears to be a promising alternative to traditional hydraulic fracturing. It demonstrates improved performance and ensures more efficient well completion. Its advantages include: reducing the cost of the operation by reducing the volume of proppant used and reducing the number of process stops due to the availability of clean liquid injection intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oil and gas technologies and environmental safety
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24143/1812-9498-2025-3-63-68
Primary Topic
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the use of cluster hydraulic fracturing in low-permeability reservoirs

Ilmira Rastyamovna Abutalieva, Raphael Ramil'evich Irgaliev, Rasulbek Galievich Rahimov
Oil and gas technologies and environmental safety
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
article

Analysis of the use of cluster hydraulic fracturing in low-permeability reservoirs

Ilmira Rastyamovna Abutalieva, Raphael Ramil'evich Irgaliev, Rasulbek Galievich Rahimov
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes and compares the innovative method of inflow intensification with the traditional one. Cluster hydraulic fracturing is an economically viable alternative to conventional hydraulic fracturing. Instead of creating a continuous proppant bundle, it forms separate clusters of proppant in the crack, which leads to the formation of additional conductive channels and increased permeability. The main advantage is a significant reduction in costs: less proppant, fluid, and surgery time are required. The technology is based on pulsed liquid injection alternating between pure liquid and liquid with proppant, which allows the formation of an optimal cluster structure. Unlike the uniform distribution of proppant in traditional hydraulic fracturing, cluster hydraulic fracturing creates “pillars” of proppant that keep the crack open. When designing a cluster hydraulic fracturing, it is necessary to take into account the distance between clusters and the density of proppant bundles. To assess the effectiveness of the technology, the productivity coefficient was used, which was reduced to the effective thickness of the reservoir. The productivity coefficient of each well was calculated based on daily production data using the Vogel correlation (for conditions below saturation pressure). The results demonstrate that the cluster hydraulic fracturing provided stable production for two years, comparable to neighboring wells. This fact, in turn, confirms the presence of channels, since the uniform distribution of proppant usually leads to significant production losses. Based on the analysis and the results obtained, cluster hydraulic fracturing appears to be a promising alternative to traditional hydraulic fracturing. It demonstrates improved performance and ensures more efficient well completion. Its advantages include: reducing the cost of the operation by reducing the volume of proppant used and reducing the number of process stops due to the availability of clean liquid injection intervals.

Oil and gas technologies and environmental safetyVol. 2025(3)
Astrakhan State Technical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of the use of cluster hydraulic fracturing in low-permeability reservoirs — Ilmira Rastyamovna Abutalieva, Raphael Ramil'evich Irgaliev, et al. · Oil and gas technologies and environmental safety (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS