Algorithmic Bias in Military AI Systems: Challenges and Solutions for Fair and Accurate Decision-Making

This paper examines algorithmic bias in AI systems used for military decision-making, identifies key sources of unfairness, and demonstrates practical mitigation strategies with implemented machine-learning experiments.We generate a synthetic but realistic dataset that mimics decisions (e.g., target identification / threat classification) with a binary sensitive attribute (e.g., group A vs group B).We implement baseline classifiers (Logistic Regression, Random Forest), measure fairness-related metrics (statistical parity difference, equal opportunity difference, disparate impact), and apply two mitigation strategies: reweighing (pre-processing) and group-specific thresholding (post-processing).Results include accuracy, fairness trade-offs, and visualizations.The paper ends with recommendations and limitations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IJARCCE
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17148/ijarcce.2025.14925
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Bias in Military AI Systems: Challenges and Solutions for Fair and Accurate Decision-Making

A. Singh
IJARCCE
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Algorithmic Bias in Military AI Systems: Challenges and Solutions for Fair and Accurate Decision-Making

A. Singh
article en

Abstract

This paper examines algorithmic bias in AI systems used for military decision-making, identifies key sources of unfairness, and demonstrates practical mitigation strategies with implemented machine-learning experiments.We generate a synthetic but realistic dataset that mimics decisions (e.g., target identification / threat classification) with a binary sensitive attribute (e.g., group A vs group B).We implement baseline classifiers (Logistic Regression, Random Forest), measure fairness-related metrics (statistical parity difference, equal opportunity difference, disparate impact), and apply two mitigation strategies: reweighing (pre-processing) and group-specific thresholding (post-processing).Results include accuracy, fairness trade-offs, and visualizations.The paper ends with recommendations and limitations.

IJARCCEVol. 14(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.