P105 Factors limiting patients engagement in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in a district general hospital

<h3>Introduction</h3> Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence is rising, yet early detection remains low. National Institute of Clinical Excellence recommends six-monthly ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing for high-risk patients. Patient engagement is key, as missed appointments waste resources and raise costs. This project explored patient and organisational factors limiting engagement with HCC surveillance in a district general hospital. <h3>Method</h3> Patients enrolled in a nurse-led HCC surveillance programme between January 2023 and December 2024 were included. Based on attendance at ultrasound, clinic, or blood test appointments, they were categorised as regular attenders (RA), or those who missed one (M1), two (M2), or three or more (M3) appointments. M2, M3 were termed frequent non-attenders (FNA). Ten patients from each category were interviewed in person or by telephone using a structured questionnaire. Data collected included demographics, occupation, social support, liver disease understanding, reasons for non-attendance, and suggestions for service improvement. <h3>Results</h3> Forty patients were interviewed, median age of 65.7 years, 24 (60%) male and 29 (72.5%) White British. Nineteen (47%) had metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and nine (22%) had alcohol related liver disease (ArLD). In M3, five (50%) had viral hepatitis and in RA, three (30%) had autoimmune liver disease. Amongst 20 FNA, 9 (45%) engaged in manual or unstable work and 7 (35%) were unemployed/health-related absences. Whereas in RA (10), 9 (90%) were retired or in secure jobs. In FNA group (20), 5 (25%) lived alone or in supported accommodation, 1 (5%) had no fixed address, 13(65%) lived with family. Out of the forty patients interviewed, 18 (45%) identified early cancer detection as the reason for surveillance. Out of 30 non-attenders (M1,2,3), 11 (36.6%) reported poor understanding of liver disease, management, or purpose of surveillance as a key barrier. In RA, 10 (100%) reported liver disease understanding with only three (10%) non-attenders (M1,2,3) being unaware. Additional factors for non-attendance were comorbidities (9, 30%), mental health disorders (7, 23%), fear or avoidance (5, 17%), administrative errors (5, 17%) and transport issues (4, 13%). Patients suggested administrative improvements (7, 23.3%), timely letters, digital reminders, flexible scheduling and clearer communication (4, 13.3%) to enhance the service. Of the total study cohort, 24 patients (60%) were highly satisfied with the service, often citing direct phone access to the surveillance team as especially helpful. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Reasons for non-attendance in HCC surveillance is multifactorial. Enhancing patient education, communication, and individualised patient-centred support may improve engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2025-basl.119
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P105 Factors limiting patients engagement in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in a district general hospital

Gayatri Chakrabarty, Siona Sabu, Karen Street, Chantelle Gibbard et al.
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

P105 Factors limiting patients engagement in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in a district general hospital

Gayatri Chakrabarty, Siona Sabu, Karen Street, Chantelle Gibbard, Louise Redgrave
article en

Abstract

<h3>Introduction</h3> Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence is rising, yet early detection remains low. National Institute of Clinical Excellence recommends six-monthly ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing for high-risk patients. Patient engagement is key, as missed appointments waste resources and raise costs. This project explored patient and organisational factors limiting engagement with HCC surveillance in a district general hospital. <h3>Method</h3> Patients enrolled in a nurse-led HCC surveillance programme between January 2023 and December 2024 were included. Based on attendance at ultrasound, clinic, or blood test appointments, they were categorised as regular attenders (RA), or those who missed one (M1), two (M2), or three or more (M3) appointments. M2, M3 were termed frequent non-attenders (FNA). Ten patients from each category were interviewed in person or by telephone using a structured questionnaire. Data collected included demographics, occupation, social support, liver disease understanding, reasons for non-attendance, and suggestions for service improvement. <h3>Results</h3> Forty patients were interviewed, median age of 65.7 years, 24 (60%) male and 29 (72.5%) White British. Nineteen (47%) had metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and nine (22%) had alcohol related liver disease (ArLD). In M3, five (50%) had viral hepatitis and in RA, three (30%) had autoimmune liver disease. Amongst 20 FNA, 9 (45%) engaged in manual or unstable work and 7 (35%) were unemployed/health-related absences. Whereas in RA (10), 9 (90%) were retired or in secure jobs. In FNA group (20), 5 (25%) lived alone or in supported accommodation, 1 (5%) had no fixed address, 13(65%) lived with family. Out of the forty patients interviewed, 18 (45%) identified early cancer detection as the reason for surveillance. Out of 30 non-attenders (M1,2,3), 11 (36.6%) reported poor understanding of liver disease, management, or purpose of surveillance as a key barrier. In RA, 10 (100%) reported liver disease understanding with only three (10%) non-attenders (M1,2,3) being unaware. Additional factors for non-attendance were comorbidities (9, 30%), mental health disorders (7, 23%), fear or avoidance (5, 17%), administrative errors (5, 17%) and transport issues (4, 13%). Patients suggested administrative improvements (7, 23.3%), timely letters, digital reminders, flexible scheduling and clearer communication (4, 13.3%) to enhance the service. Of the total study cohort, 24 patients (60%) were highly satisfied with the service, often citing direct phone access to the surveillance team as especially helpful. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Reasons for non-attendance in HCC surveillance is multifactorial. Enhancing patient education, communication, and individualised patient-centred support may improve engagement.

Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.