Network Analytics for Anti-money Laundering—A Systematic Literature Review and Experimental Evaluation

Money laundering presents a pervasive challenge, burdening society by financing illegal activities. The use of network information is increasingly being explored to effectively combat money laundering given that it involves connected parties. This led to a surge in research on network analytics for anti-money laundering (AML). The literature is, however, fragmented, and a comprehensive overview of existing work is missing. This results in limited understanding of the methods to apply and their comparative detection power. This paper presents an extensive and unique literature review based on 97 papers from Web of Science and Scopus, resulting in a taxonomy following a recently proposed fraud analytics framework. We conclude that most research relies on expert-based rules and manual features, whereas deep learning methods have been gaining traction. This paper also presents a comprehensive framework to evaluate and compare the performance of prominent methods in a standardized setup. We compare manual feature engineering, random walk-based, and deep learning methods on two publicly available data sets. We conclude (1) that network analytics increases the predictive power but caution is needed when applying graph neural networks in the face of class imbalance and network topology and (2) that care should be taken with synthetic data as they can give overly optimistic results. The open-source implementation facilitates researchers and practitioners to extend this work on proprietary data, promoting a standardized approach for the analysis and evaluation of network analytics for AML. History: Galit Shmueli served as the senior editor for this article. Funding: This work was supported by Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [Grants 1SHEN24N and G015020N] and the BNP Paribas Fortis [Grant Research Chair on Fraud Analytics]. The resources and services used in this work were provided by the Flemish Supercomputer Center funded by the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek and the Flemish Government. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ijds.2024.0042 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INFORMS Journal on Data Science
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/ijds.2024.0042
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Network Analytics for Anti-money Laundering—A Systematic Literature Review and Experimental Evaluation

Toon Vanderschueren, Wouter Verbeke, Bart Baesens, Tim Verdonck et al.
INFORMS Journal on Data Science
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
article

Network Analytics for Anti-money Laundering—A Systematic Literature Review and Experimental Evaluation

Toon Vanderschueren, Wouter Verbeke, Bart Baesens, Tim Verdonck, Bruno Deprez
article en

Abstract

Money laundering presents a pervasive challenge, burdening society by financing illegal activities. The use of network information is increasingly being explored to effectively combat money laundering given that it involves connected parties. This led to a surge in research on network analytics for anti-money laundering (AML). The literature is, however, fragmented, and a comprehensive overview of existing work is missing. This results in limited understanding of the methods to apply and their comparative detection power. This paper presents an extensive and unique literature review based on 97 papers from Web of Science and Scopus, resulting in a taxonomy following a recently proposed fraud analytics framework. We conclude that most research relies on expert-based rules and manual features, whereas deep learning methods have been gaining traction. This paper also presents a comprehensive framework to evaluate and compare the performance of prominent methods in a standardized setup. We compare manual feature engineering, random walk-based, and deep learning methods on two publicly available data sets. We conclude (1) that network analytics increases the predictive power but caution is needed when applying graph neural networks in the face of class imbalance and network topology and (2) that care should be taken with synthetic data as they can give overly optimistic results. The open-source implementation facilitates researchers and practitioners to extend this work on proprietary data, promoting a standardized approach for the analysis and evaluation of network analytics for AML. History: Galit Shmueli served as the senior editor for this article. Funding: This work was supported by Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [Grants 1SHEN24N and G015020N] and the BNP Paribas Fortis [Grant Research Chair on Fraud Analytics]. The resources and services used in this work were provided by the Flemish Supercomputer Center funded by the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek and the Flemish Government. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ijds.2024.0042 .

INFORMS Journal on Data Science
University of Antwerp (BE), IMEC (BE), University of Southampton (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.