New Evaluation System for Extra-Heavy Oil Viscosity Reducer Effectiveness: From 1D Static Viscosity Reduction to 3D SAGD Chemical–Thermal Synergy

To overcome the production bottleneck induced by the high viscosity of extra-heavy oil and resolve the issues of limited efficiency in traditional thermal oil recovery methods (including cyclic steam stimulation (CSS), steam flooding, and steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD)) as well as the fragmentation of existing viscosity reducer evaluation systems, this study establishes a multi-dimensional evaluation system for the effectiveness of viscosity reducers, with stage-averaged remaining oil saturation as the core benchmarks. A “1D static → 2D dynamic → 3D synergistic” progressive sequential experimental design was adopted. In the 1D static experiments, multi-gradient concentration tests were conducted to analyze the variation law of the viscosity reduction rate of viscosity reducers, thereby screening out the optimal adapted concentration for subsequent experiments. For the 2D dynamic experiments, sand-packed tubes were used as the experimental carrier to compare the oil recovery efficiencies of ultimate steam flooding, viscosity reducer flooding with different concentrations, and the composite process of “steam flooding → viscosity reducer flooding → secondary steam flooding”, which clarified the functional value of viscosity reducers in dynamic displacement. In the 3D synergistic experiments, slab cores were employed to simulate the SAGD development process after multiple rounds of cyclic steam stimulation, aiming to explore the regulatory effect of viscosity reducers on residual oil distribution and oil recovery factor. This novel evaluation system clearly elaborates the synergistic mechanism of viscosity reducers, i.e., “chemical empowerment (emulsification and viscosity reduction, wettability alteration) + thermal amplification (steam carrying and displacement, steam chamber expansion)”. It fills the gap in the existing evaluation chain, which previously lacked a connection from static performance to dynamic displacement and further to multi-process synergistic adaptation. Moreover, it provides quantifiable and implementable evaluation criteria for steam–chemical composite flooding of extra-heavy oil, effectively releasing the efficiency-enhancing potential of viscosity reducers. This study holds critical supporting significance for promoting the efficient and economical development of extra-heavy oil resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195307
Primary Topic
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Evaluation System for Extra-Heavy Oil Viscosity Reducer Effectiveness: From 1D Static Viscosity Reduction to 3D SAGD Chemical–Thermal Synergy

Enhui Pei, Chao Xu, Jing Yang, Hongbo Li
Energies
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
article

New Evaluation System for Extra-Heavy Oil Viscosity Reducer Effectiveness: From 1D Static Viscosity Reduction to 3D SAGD Chemical–Thermal Synergy

Enhui Pei, Chao Xu, Jing Yang, Hongbo Li
article en

Abstract

To overcome the production bottleneck induced by the high viscosity of extra-heavy oil and resolve the issues of limited efficiency in traditional thermal oil recovery methods (including cyclic steam stimulation (CSS), steam flooding, and steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD)) as well as the fragmentation of existing viscosity reducer evaluation systems, this study establishes a multi-dimensional evaluation system for the effectiveness of viscosity reducers, with stage-averaged remaining oil saturation as the core benchmarks. A “1D static → 2D dynamic → 3D synergistic” progressive sequential experimental design was adopted. In the 1D static experiments, multi-gradient concentration tests were conducted to analyze the variation law of the viscosity reduction rate of viscosity reducers, thereby screening out the optimal adapted concentration for subsequent experiments. For the 2D dynamic experiments, sand-packed tubes were used as the experimental carrier to compare the oil recovery efficiencies of ultimate steam flooding, viscosity reducer flooding with different concentrations, and the composite process of “steam flooding → viscosity reducer flooding → secondary steam flooding”, which clarified the functional value of viscosity reducers in dynamic displacement. In the 3D synergistic experiments, slab cores were employed to simulate the SAGD development process after multiple rounds of cyclic steam stimulation, aiming to explore the regulatory effect of viscosity reducers on residual oil distribution and oil recovery factor. This novel evaluation system clearly elaborates the synergistic mechanism of viscosity reducers, i.e., “chemical empowerment (emulsification and viscosity reduction, wettability alteration) + thermal amplification (steam carrying and displacement, steam chamber expansion)”. It fills the gap in the existing evaluation chain, which previously lacked a connection from static performance to dynamic displacement and further to multi-process synergistic adaptation. Moreover, it provides quantifiable and implementable evaluation criteria for steam–chemical composite flooding of extra-heavy oil, effectively releasing the efficiency-enhancing potential of viscosity reducers. This study holds critical supporting significance for promoting the efficient and economical development of extra-heavy oil resources.

EnergiesVol. 18(19)
Northeast Petroleum University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.