Redefining Law in China

Abstract Although there is a growing body of literature on the role of law under authoritarian regimes, scholars have paid little attention to authoritarian legal ideology or conceptions of legality in contemporary authoritarian states. This Article presents the first in-depth study of the Chinese Communist Party’s recent novel attempt to introduce and implement an official legal ideology under the banner of “Xi Jinping’s Thought on the Rule of Law,” one which aims both to create a definitive theory of law and to offer a guide to China’s legal development. We examine four principal components of this legal ideology: the theoretical definition of the relationship between law and the Party; the push towards Party-led non-litigation dispute resolution that de-emphasizes courts; efforts to increase the extraterritorial reach of Chinese law and to boost China’s influence in transnational law and legal institutions; and attempts to integrate both Party-defined morality and the Party’s own internal rules and regulations into the legal system and the definition of legality. Through these efforts, the Party is attempting to provide a new definition of legality, one that is coextensive with Party authority and derives from the Party’s internal normative sources. As a result, legality becomes a vehicle for the Party to consolidate its legitimacy and assert its supremacy. Examining contemporary Chinese legal ideology carries methodological implications, highlighting the importance of understanding how authoritarian systems conceive of and define law so as to better evaluate the functions of law under authoritarianism. Understanding this new legal ideology also reveals how the definition of law is increasingly contested, in particular as liberal conceptions of legality encounter new challenges both within liberal democracies and globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Comparative Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avaf025
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining Law in China

Zhe Liu, Benjamin L. Liebman
The American Journal of Comparative Law
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

Redefining Law in China

Zhe Liu, Benjamin L. Liebman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although there is a growing body of literature on the role of law under authoritarian regimes, scholars have paid little attention to authoritarian legal ideology or conceptions of legality in contemporary authoritarian states. This Article presents the first in-depth study of the Chinese Communist Party’s recent novel attempt to introduce and implement an official legal ideology under the banner of “Xi Jinping’s Thought on the Rule of Law,” one which aims both to create a definitive theory of law and to offer a guide to China’s legal development. We examine four principal components of this legal ideology: the theoretical definition of the relationship between law and the Party; the push towards Party-led non-litigation dispute resolution that de-emphasizes courts; efforts to increase the extraterritorial reach of Chinese law and to boost China’s influence in transnational law and legal institutions; and attempts to integrate both Party-defined morality and the Party’s own internal rules and regulations into the legal system and the definition of legality. Through these efforts, the Party is attempting to provide a new definition of legality, one that is coextensive with Party authority and derives from the Party’s internal normative sources. As a result, legality becomes a vehicle for the Party to consolidate its legitimacy and assert its supremacy. Examining contemporary Chinese legal ideology carries methodological implications, highlighting the importance of understanding how authoritarian systems conceive of and define law so as to better evaluate the functions of law under authoritarianism. Understanding this new legal ideology also reveals how the definition of law is increasingly contested, in particular as liberal conceptions of legality encounter new challenges both within liberal democracies and globally.

The American Journal of Comparative LawVol. 73(3)
New York Law School (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.