Comparing the effects of left bundle branch pacing and leadless right ventricular pacing on intraventricular and interventricular dyssynchrony using in silico modelling

LCPM produces less interventricular dyssynchrony than LBBP in the presence of extensive septal scarring involving the HPS. In the setting of proximal LBBB, LCPM at the RVOT-S level may be non-inferior to LBBP in terms of interventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1644520
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the effects of left bundle branch pacing and leadless right ventricular pacing on intraventricular and interventricular dyssynchrony using in silico modelling

Steven Niederer, Gernot Plank, Christopher A. Rinaldi, Nadeev Wijesuriya et al.
Frontiers in Physiology
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Comparing the effects of left bundle branch pacing and leadless right ventricular pacing on intraventricular and interventricular dyssynchrony using in silico modelling

Steven Niederer, Gernot Plank, Christopher A. Rinaldi, Nadeev Wijesuriya, Felicity de Vere, Edward J. Vigmond, Sandra Howell, Marina Strocchi, Alphonsus Liew, Karli K. Gillette, Cristobal Rodero
article en

Abstract

LCPM produces less interventricular dyssynchrony than LBBP in the presence of extensive septal scarring involving the HPS. In the setting of proximal LBBB, LCPM at the RVOT-S level may be non-inferior to LBBP in terms of interventricular dyssynchrony.

Frontiers in PhysiologyVol. 16
Université de Bordeaux (FR), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Medical University of Graz (AT), University of Utah (US), Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute (FR), BioTechMed-Graz (AT), The Alan Turing Institute (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing the effects of left bundle branch pacing and leadless right ventricular pacing on intraventricular and interventricular dyssynchrony using in silico modelling — Steven Niederer, Gernot Plank, et al. · Frontiers in Physiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS