Out of the Shadows: Responsive Judicial Review and the Resurgence of the Notwithstanding Clause

This paper argues that the recent resurgence of section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms represents a generational challenge to both the role of courts and the legitimacy of fundamental rights. In this light, the paper argues that Rosalind Dixon’s theoretical framework prescribes a self-weakened form of judicial review in order to preserve the courts’ role as democratic constitutional guardians in the medium term. However, some Canadian courts have gone in the opposite direction, opting for a super-strong form of judicial review. As Dixon cautions, this form of judicial review may be very detrimental in the medium term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21991/cf29495
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Out of the Shadows: Responsive Judicial Review and the Resurgence of the Notwithstanding Clause

Marion Sandilands
Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
article

Out of the Shadows: Responsive Judicial Review and the Resurgence of the Notwithstanding Clause

Marion Sandilands
article en

Abstract

This paper argues that the recent resurgence of section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms represents a generational challenge to both the role of courts and the legitimacy of fundamental rights. In this light, the paper argues that Rosalind Dixon’s theoretical framework prescribes a self-weakened form of judicial review in order to preserve the courts’ role as democratic constitutional guardians in the medium term. However, some Canadian courts have gone in the opposite direction, opting for a super-strong form of judicial review. As Dixon cautions, this form of judicial review may be very detrimental in the medium term.

Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnelVol. 34(1)
Conway School of Landscape Design (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.