Gas Holdup Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches

Gas holdup estimation is important in gas-liquid systems while designing chemical, petroleum, and environmental engineering processes. The aim of this project was to develop an XGBoost algorithm-based machine learning model to forecast gas holdup from very simple to moderate characteristics varying at the start; these are superficial gas velocity, sparger hole diameter, gas and liquid densities, liquid height, additive and ion concentration ratio, and concentrations of ions and additives. Preprocessing of data involved the step of shuffling between 4043 data points and normalizing them to create consistency. Lasso Regression, Recursive Feature Elimination, and feature importance analysis aided in reducing the best predictors, making the model simpler without affecting accuracy. Five machine learning algorithms—Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting (GB), and XGBoost—were compared on R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, MAE, and RMSE. The R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> plot shows that XGBoost outperformed all the models, with 0.9595 accuracy using 12 features and 0.9545 using 7 features. Gradient Boosting came close, and Random Forest showed competitive but inconsistent accuracy. SVM was consistent but lower in performance, and Decision Trees showed the lowest R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> values, indicating poor generalization. An interactive Shiny app was developed to apply a truncated XGBoost model for real-time predictions with unnormalized inputs. The project demonstrates XGBoost's potential and machine learning's potential for accurate gas holdup prediction in industrial processes.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccsce65566.2025.11182686
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gas Holdup Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches

Ashutosh Marathe, Kunal M. Goyal, Madhura Kulkarni, Aditi S. Marathe et al.
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Gas Holdup Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches

Ashutosh Marathe, Kunal M. Goyal, Madhura Kulkarni, Aditi S. Marathe, Sujata N. Kale, Tanmay M. Aradhye, Anish V. Bene
article en

Abstract

Gas holdup estimation is important in gas-liquid systems while designing chemical, petroleum, and environmental engineering processes. The aim of this project was to develop an XGBoost algorithm-based machine learning model to forecast gas holdup from very simple to moderate characteristics varying at the start; these are superficial gas velocity, sparger hole diameter, gas and liquid densities, liquid height, additive and ion concentration ratio, and concentrations of ions and additives. Preprocessing of data involved the step of shuffling between 4043 data points and normalizing them to create consistency. Lasso Regression, Recursive Feature Elimination, and feature importance analysis aided in reducing the best predictors, making the model simpler without affecting accuracy. Five machine learning algorithms—Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting (GB), and XGBoost—were compared on R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, MAE, and RMSE. The R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> plot shows that XGBoost outperformed all the models, with 0.9595 accuracy using 12 features and 0.9545 using 7 features. Gradient Boosting came close, and Random Forest showed competitive but inconsistent accuracy. SVM was consistent but lower in performance, and Decision Trees showed the lowest R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> values, indicating poor generalization. An interactive Shiny app was developed to apply a truncated XGBoost model for real-time predictions with unnormalized inputs. The project demonstrates XGBoost's potential and machine learning's potential for accurate gas holdup prediction in industrial processes.

Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gas Holdup Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches — Ashutosh Marathe, Kunal M. Goyal, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS