Techno-Economic Evaluation of Diesel and Hybrid Propulsion Systems for Tugboats at Ports

The maritime sector, while essential for global trade, is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, creating an urgent need for cleaner propulsion technologies. This paper compares the technical and economic performances of diesel mechanical propulsion systems and hybrid propulsion systems in tugboat operations at Maltese ports. Using measured generator load datasets, the results showed that HPS reduces the annual fuel consumption by 14% from 252 to 216 tons. This leads to a corresponding 112-tons reduction in CO₂ emissions, from 796 tons to 684 tons. Economic analysis showed that HPS achieves annual operational cost savings of €22,104, representing a 10.3% cost reduction compared to DMPS driven by reduced diesel fuel consumption and strategic use of onboard battery power, even when accounting for unsubsidized electricity costs for charging onboard battery banks. These results demonstrate that HPS is a sustainable and cost-effective alternative, supporting global decarbonization goals and compliance with local environmental standards. This paper also estimates the capital investment for hybrid adoption, discusses battery lifecycle considerations, and evaluates the broader applicability of the findings across maritime environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/powertech59965.2025.11180548
Primary Topic
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Diesel and Hybrid Propulsion Systems for Tugboats at Ports

Muhammad Sadiq, Alexander Micallef, Chun‐Lien Su, Cedric Caruana et al.
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
article

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Diesel and Hybrid Propulsion Systems for Tugboats at Ports

Muhammad Sadiq, Alexander Micallef, Chun‐Lien Su, Cedric Caruana, John Licari, Maurice Apap
article en

Abstract

The maritime sector, while essential for global trade, is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, creating an urgent need for cleaner propulsion technologies. This paper compares the technical and economic performances of diesel mechanical propulsion systems and hybrid propulsion systems in tugboat operations at Maltese ports. Using measured generator load datasets, the results showed that HPS reduces the annual fuel consumption by 14% from 252 to 216 tons. This leads to a corresponding 112-tons reduction in CO₂ emissions, from 796 tons to 684 tons. Economic analysis showed that HPS achieves annual operational cost savings of €22,104, representing a 10.3% cost reduction compared to DMPS driven by reduced diesel fuel consumption and strategic use of onboard battery power, even when accounting for unsubsidized electricity costs for charging onboard battery banks. These results demonstrate that HPS is a sustainable and cost-effective alternative, supporting global decarbonization goals and compliance with local environmental standards. This paper also estimates the capital investment for hybrid adoption, discusses battery lifecycle considerations, and evaluates the broader applicability of the findings across maritime environments.

University of Malta (MT), National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Diesel and Hybrid Propulsion Systems for Tugboats at Ports — Muhammad Sadiq, Alexander Micallef, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS