Evaluation Methodology for Assessing the Benefits of Assistance Systems in Power System Control Center

The increasing complexity of power system operations, driven by the integration of renewable energies and the demand for faster response times, necessitates advanced operator assistance systems in control rooms. This paper presents a novel methodology for evaluating the benefits of cognitive assistance systems, combining the SPAR-H method and NASA Task Load Index to assess operator error probability and workload. Using a simulated test network, the methodology is validated across scenarios of varying complexity, demonstrating a significant reduction in Human Error Probability and highlighting the potential of assistance systems to enhance decision-making and grid stability. While results confirm the theoretical advantages of the approach, further validation with real-world operators is planned to strengthen its practical applicability. This study contributes to advancing the reliability and safety of grid operations through innovative evaluation techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/powertech59965.2025.11180426
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Grid and Power Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Methodology for Assessing the Benefits of Assistance Systems in Power System Control Center

Steffen Schlegel, Dirk Westermann, Nadja Isabelle Belz, Daniel Först
1 citations
Smart Grid and Power Systems
0.73
article

Evaluation Methodology for Assessing the Benefits of Assistance Systems in Power System Control Center

Steffen Schlegel, Dirk Westermann, Nadja Isabelle Belz, Daniel Först
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increasing complexity of power system operations, driven by the integration of renewable energies and the demand for faster response times, necessitates advanced operator assistance systems in control rooms. This paper presents a novel methodology for evaluating the benefits of cognitive assistance systems, combining the SPAR-H method and NASA Task Load Index to assess operator error probability and workload. Using a simulated test network, the methodology is validated across scenarios of varying complexity, demonstrating a significant reduction in Human Error Probability and highlighting the potential of assistance systems to enhance decision-making and grid stability. While results confirm the theoretical advantages of the approach, further validation with real-world operators is planned to strengthen its practical applicability. This study contributes to advancing the reliability and safety of grid operations through innovative evaluation techniques.

Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Smart Grid and Power Systems
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.