Experimental Performance Evaluation of MMWave Radars

This paper presents an experimental evaluation of the performance of three millimeter wave (mmWave) radars: two FMCW radars, i.e., IWR6843ISK and IWR1843BOOST, and one CW radar, i.e., Sense2Go Pulse. The evaluation was conducted in controlled indoor and outdoor scenarios, utilizing a measurement protocol tailored to the capabilities of each radar. Metrics such as detection rate, accuracy, and precision were considered, with a focus on non-contact monitoring applications. The results enable a comparison of the capabilities of each technology and radar, depending on the environment, and their applicability for people and motion detection tasks. The results highlight that the Sense2GoL Pulse radar performed best in terms of detection rate, with a longer range and consistent detections. The IWR6843ISK radar performed the worst outdoors, although it showed significant improvement indoors. The IWR1843BOOST radar offered a more balanced performance in both scenarios. Overall, the Sense2GoL radar was observed to improve its performance in outdoor conditions, while the IWR6843ISK and IWR1843BOOST radars performed better indoors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/colcom66267.2025.11185778
Primary Topic
Antenna Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Performance Evaluation of MMWave Radars

Santiago Rojas, Víctor Quintero
Antenna Design and Analysis
article

Experimental Performance Evaluation of MMWave Radars

Santiago Rojas, Víctor Quintero
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental evaluation of the performance of three millimeter wave (mmWave) radars: two FMCW radars, i.e., IWR6843ISK and IWR1843BOOST, and one CW radar, i.e., Sense2Go Pulse. The evaluation was conducted in controlled indoor and outdoor scenarios, utilizing a measurement protocol tailored to the capabilities of each radar. Metrics such as detection rate, accuracy, and precision were considered, with a focus on non-contact monitoring applications. The results enable a comparison of the capabilities of each technology and radar, depending on the environment, and their applicability for people and motion detection tasks. The results highlight that the Sense2GoL Pulse radar performed best in terms of detection rate, with a longer range and consistent detections. The IWR6843ISK radar performed the worst outdoors, although it showed significant improvement indoors. The IWR1843BOOST radar offered a more balanced performance in both scenarios. Overall, the Sense2GoL radar was observed to improve its performance in outdoor conditions, while the IWR6843ISK and IWR1843BOOST radars performed better indoors.

University of Cauca (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Antenna Design and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.