Event-Based ADCs vs. Nyquist ADCs: Rethinking Performance Metrics

Event-based analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) are an interesting alternative to conventional Nyquist ADCs. However, their application is far from mainstream. One reason for this lack of industry adoption might be the absence of a universal performance metric for event-based ADCs that can be used robustly to compare them with Nyquist ADCs. This article addresses this gap by summarizing key theoretical concepts and highlighting primary distinctions between event-based ADCs and Nyquist ADCs. The theoretical findings are substantiated by the measurement results of a demonstrator implemented at the PCB level. Building on these insights, the work demonstrates that the conventional figures of merit (FoMs) used for Nyquist ADCs are inadequate to evaluate event-based ADCs, prompting the development of a new and tailored performance metric. Finally, the performance of state of the art integrated event-based ADCs is evaluated using the proposed FoM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/austrochip67945.2025.11183710
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Event-Based ADCs vs. Nyquist ADCs: Rethinking Performance Metrics

Michael Lunglmayr, Harald Pretl, Simon Dorrer, Bernhard A. Moser et al.
1 citations
Fault Detection and Control Systems
1.21
article

Event-Based ADCs vs. Nyquist ADCs: Rethinking Performance Metrics

Michael Lunglmayr, Harald Pretl, Simon Dorrer, Bernhard A. Moser, Anna Werzi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Event-based analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) are an interesting alternative to conventional Nyquist ADCs. However, their application is far from mainstream. One reason for this lack of industry adoption might be the absence of a universal performance metric for event-based ADCs that can be used robustly to compare them with Nyquist ADCs. This article addresses this gap by summarizing key theoretical concepts and highlighting primary distinctions between event-based ADCs and Nyquist ADCs. The theoretical findings are substantiated by the measurement results of a demonstrator implemented at the PCB level. Building on these insights, the work demonstrates that the conventional figures of merit (FoMs) used for Nyquist ADCs are inadequate to evaluate event-based ADCs, prompting the development of a new and tailored performance metric. Finally, the performance of state of the art integrated event-based ADCs is evaluated using the proposed FoM.

Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.