Effects of virtual reality simulation on medical students’ emotional and subjective experience compared to high-fidelity simulation in pediatrics clerkship

This study aimed to explore the educational impact of virtual reality (VR) simulation compared to high-fidelity (HF) simulation. Recently, VR simulation has been integrated into medical education, offering advantages such as cost- and space-efficiency, accessibility, and autonomy, enabling self-directed, repeated practice. Prior research comparing VR and HF simulations has focused primarily on knowledge acquisition, skill development, and learner satisfaction. Given that medical students often experience low confidence and high anxiety during clinical transitions, it is essential to examine the VR simulation's impact on these emotional factors and students' subjective experiences. This study investigated the effects of VR and HF simulations on anxiety, confidence, engagement, and perceived learning using multiple-item self-report scales. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests to compare the two simulation methods. The study included 40 fifth-year Korean medical students in a pediatric clerkship. Participants completed both VR and HF simulations, followed by a questionnaire assessing these variables. Results showed no statistically significant differences between VR and HF simulations across the measured domains. However, item-level analysis indicated slightly higher anxiety in VR simulation but greater perceived learning in cognitive domain, suggesting that VR may be more beneficial for cognitive learning compared to HF simulation. As VR simulation has only recently been incorporated into medical education, this study represents a first attempt to compare its impact with that of HF simulation focusing on subjective outcomes. Although no significant differences were found, the cost and space efficiency of VR simulation along with its support for autonomous learning underscore the need for further research, particularly on students' experiences, and learning objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323150
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of virtual reality simulation on medical students’ emotional and subjective experience compared to high-fidelity simulation in pediatrics clerkship

Su Kyung Lee, Mira Kim, Hyun Joo Jung, Se-Jin Kim et al.
3 citations
PLoS ONE
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
3.49
article

Effects of virtual reality simulation on medical students’ emotional and subjective experience compared to high-fidelity simulation in pediatrics clerkship

Su Kyung Lee, Mira Kim, Hyun Joo Jung, Se-Jin Kim, Jang Hoon Lee, Ji Hye Yu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the educational impact of virtual reality (VR) simulation compared to high-fidelity (HF) simulation. Recently, VR simulation has been integrated into medical education, offering advantages such as cost- and space-efficiency, accessibility, and autonomy, enabling self-directed, repeated practice. Prior research comparing VR and HF simulations has focused primarily on knowledge acquisition, skill development, and learner satisfaction. Given that medical students often experience low confidence and high anxiety during clinical transitions, it is essential to examine the VR simulation's impact on these emotional factors and students' subjective experiences. This study investigated the effects of VR and HF simulations on anxiety, confidence, engagement, and perceived learning using multiple-item self-report scales. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests to compare the two simulation methods. The study included 40 fifth-year Korean medical students in a pediatric clerkship. Participants completed both VR and HF simulations, followed by a questionnaire assessing these variables. Results showed no statistically significant differences between VR and HF simulations across the measured domains. However, item-level analysis indicated slightly higher anxiety in VR simulation but greater perceived learning in cognitive domain, suggesting that VR may be more beneficial for cognitive learning compared to HF simulation. As VR simulation has only recently been incorporated into medical education, this study represents a first attempt to compare its impact with that of HF simulation focusing on subjective outcomes. Although no significant differences were found, the cost and space efficiency of VR simulation along with its support for autonomous learning underscore the need for further research, particularly on students' experiences, and learning objectives.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
Seoul National University of Education (KR), New Generation University College (ET), Ajou University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.