Process debt in agile software development: a systematic literature review

Process Debt (PD) in software development arises from suboptimal processes and inefficiencies and negatively impacts productivity, product quality, and organisational adaptability, manifesting itself in delays and rework. Although interrelated with technical and organisational debt, it has received little attention, leaving gaps in its definition and management, and the lack of standardised models hinders strategic decision-making. With this in mind, a Systematic Literature Review was conducted exploring seven academic databases, where 20 primary studies found between 2013 and 2025 were selected. The results reveal that current solutions for PD are pivotally conceptual and evaluative, suggesting an intermediate maturity of the field and the need for more applied approaches. Among the most frequently identified causes of process debt are: lack of communication, organisational silos, and poor documentation, leading to negative impacts such as increased costs and poor software quality. It is concluded that, despite the challenges, PD management offers significant benefits in software quality and operational efficiency, highlighting the urgency of developing early identification tools and empirically validating conceptual frameworks to optimise development processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/colcom66267.2025.11185782
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process debt in agile software development: a systematic literature review

Oscar Maurício Caicedo Rendón, César Pardo, Bárbara Díaz, Astrid Carolina Cruz Trochez
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
article

Process debt in agile software development: a systematic literature review

Oscar Maurício Caicedo Rendón, César Pardo, Bárbara Díaz, Astrid Carolina Cruz Trochez
article en

Abstract

Process Debt (PD) in software development arises from suboptimal processes and inefficiencies and negatively impacts productivity, product quality, and organisational adaptability, manifesting itself in delays and rework. Although interrelated with technical and organisational debt, it has received little attention, leaving gaps in its definition and management, and the lack of standardised models hinders strategic decision-making. With this in mind, a Systematic Literature Review was conducted exploring seven academic databases, where 20 primary studies found between 2013 and 2025 were selected. The results reveal that current solutions for PD are pivotally conceptual and evaluative, suggesting an intermediate maturity of the field and the need for more applied approaches. Among the most frequently identified causes of process debt are: lack of communication, organisational silos, and poor documentation, leading to negative impacts such as increased costs and poor software quality. It is concluded that, despite the challenges, PD management offers significant benefits in software quality and operational efficiency, highlighting the urgency of developing early identification tools and empirically validating conceptual frameworks to optimise development processes.

University of Cauca (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.