Why Internal Representations and Their Temporal Dependence Matter for Emotion Inference

Inferences about others’ emotions have largely examined judgments from static presentation of cues (e.g., facial “expressions”), ignoring temporally dynamic and integrative aspects. Here, we extend insights from predictive processing accounts, focusing on the hypothesis of temporal dependence , to review the current evidence and advance the investigation of the contextual and dynamic nature of emotion inferences. Consistent with constructionist views, we theorize that people dynamically form models of others’ emotions by drawing on varied representations that contribute to divergent predictions and, ultimately, inferences. We review evidence for the role of internal representations in emotion inferences and for variability in conceptual representations of emotions then outline how predictive processing accounts can inform new empirical questions about the temporal dynamics in emotion inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emotion Review
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739251379801
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Emotions and Moral Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Internal Representations and Their Temporal Dependence Matter for Emotion Inference

Maria Gendron, Srishti Goel
1 citations
Emotion Review
Emotions and Moral Behavior
2.44
article

Why Internal Representations and Their Temporal Dependence Matter for Emotion Inference

Maria Gendron, Srishti Goel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Inferences about others’ emotions have largely examined judgments from static presentation of cues (e.g., facial “expressions”), ignoring temporally dynamic and integrative aspects. Here, we extend insights from predictive processing accounts, focusing on the hypothesis of temporal dependence , to review the current evidence and advance the investigation of the contextual and dynamic nature of emotion inferences. Consistent with constructionist views, we theorize that people dynamically form models of others’ emotions by drawing on varied representations that contribute to divergent predictions and, ultimately, inferences. We review evidence for the role of internal representations in emotion inferences and for variability in conceptual representations of emotions then outline how predictive processing accounts can inform new empirical questions about the temporal dynamics in emotion inference.

Emotion ReviewVol. 18(1)
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Emotions and Moral Behavior
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.