Does the U.S. Federal Deficit Respond More to Revenues, Expenses, or GDP Growth? A Time-Varying Coefficient Analysis

The feasibility of fiscal stimulus depends on levels of sovereign debt and future impacts on budget deficits, regardless of whether it is effective at increasing economic growth. This paper tests whether changes in revenues, expenses, GDP growth rates, private investment, and monetary stimulus affect the United States federal deficit one year after the change, taking account of fiscal multiplier effects. A state space model with time-varying coefficients from 1963 through 2019 shows that the deficit responds somewhat more to expenses, especially social insurance outlays, implying that entitlement reform may be the single best policy for fiscal solvency. For much of the time period, revenues and expenses are insignificant except in times of major upheaval and rapid change, showing the political nature of the problem and demonstrating that the solution must involve both revenues and expenses simultaneously, with careful attention to multiplier effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Finance Review
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421251385269
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the U.S. Federal Deficit Respond More to Revenues, Expenses, or GDP Growth? A Time-Varying Coefficient Analysis

Robert Gmeiner
Public Finance Review
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

Does the U.S. Federal Deficit Respond More to Revenues, Expenses, or GDP Growth? A Time-Varying Coefficient Analysis

Robert Gmeiner
article en

Abstract

The feasibility of fiscal stimulus depends on levels of sovereign debt and future impacts on budget deficits, regardless of whether it is effective at increasing economic growth. This paper tests whether changes in revenues, expenses, GDP growth rates, private investment, and monetary stimulus affect the United States federal deficit one year after the change, taking account of fiscal multiplier effects. A state space model with time-varying coefficients from 1963 through 2019 shows that the deficit responds somewhat more to expenses, especially social insurance outlays, implying that entitlement reform may be the single best policy for fiscal solvency. For much of the time period, revenues and expenses are insignificant except in times of major upheaval and rapid change, showing the political nature of the problem and demonstrating that the solution must involve both revenues and expenses simultaneously, with careful attention to multiplier effects.

Public Finance ReviewVol. 54(1)
University of South Dakota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.