Nietzsche's causality: On the enchanted and the automatic

This paper studies the invention of causality as a case study, not as a metaphor or interpretation, but as an old and beautiful lie that has attained objective reality/being. Causality is real because it is real ‘for us’, because it contains the characteristics that we habitually tie to phenomenality – the traits that are the only possible attributes of reality. Causality was born out of prayer and is at least as vulnerable as was God before we killed him. We ought to learn from Nietzsche that all things, and even those that at some stage garner unquestionable belief, are capable of perishing. It has been posited that for Nietzsche, a will to absolute knowledge may destroy the seeker: it is a will to death. It has not yet been explored that the same may potentially imperil key elements of living being. Nietzsche's defence of life against knowledge has never really been heard: left irrationalism – that is, poststructuralism – frequently claims Nietzsche as a founder of its project, but is a generalised denial of the importance of being (we study ‘discourse’, which by virtue of being discourse is presupposed to be something other than reality), and right irrationalism, though many today say it is Nietzschean, mostly appears as a politics of generalised ressentiment , which by definition cannot be Nietzschean. Nietzsche, in short, is used today to deny or resent being, and thus is primarily misused. This paper will show that Nietzsche, properly heard, is a defender of both being and life, and that there are interconnected benefits to engaging with his unique ontology and politics. In recent discussions of the ‘discovery’ of Nietzsche's hatred of the left of politics, his equal and opposite hatred of the right has been somewhat muted, and ought to be heard as well. Nietzsche ultimately despised modernity , because it seemed to him that nobody knew how to be alive. As the fight between left and right becomes increasingly absurd in the 21st century (for Nietzsche, a fight between those who want Socratic undeath and those who want, like Socrates, just actual death), another look at Nietzsche's ontology and politics is timely.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thesis Eleven
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136251381379
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nietzsche's causality: On the enchanted and the automatic

Lachlan Ross
Thesis Eleven
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
article

Nietzsche's causality: On the enchanted and the automatic

Lachlan Ross
article en

Abstract

This paper studies the invention of causality as a case study, not as a metaphor or interpretation, but as an old and beautiful lie that has attained objective reality/being. Causality is real because it is real ‘for us’, because it contains the characteristics that we habitually tie to phenomenality – the traits that are the only possible attributes of reality. Causality was born out of prayer and is at least as vulnerable as was God before we killed him. We ought to learn from Nietzsche that all things, and even those that at some stage garner unquestionable belief, are capable of perishing. It has been posited that for Nietzsche, a will to absolute knowledge may destroy the seeker: it is a will to death. It has not yet been explored that the same may potentially imperil key elements of living being. Nietzsche's defence of life against knowledge has never really been heard: left irrationalism – that is, poststructuralism – frequently claims Nietzsche as a founder of its project, but is a generalised denial of the importance of being (we study ‘discourse’, which by virtue of being discourse is presupposed to be something other than reality), and right irrationalism, though many today say it is Nietzschean, mostly appears as a politics of generalised ressentiment , which by definition cannot be Nietzschean. Nietzsche, in short, is used today to deny or resent being, and thus is primarily misused. This paper will show that Nietzsche, properly heard, is a defender of both being and life, and that there are interconnected benefits to engaging with his unique ontology and politics. In recent discussions of the ‘discovery’ of Nietzsche's hatred of the left of politics, his equal and opposite hatred of the right has been somewhat muted, and ought to be heard as well. Nietzsche ultimately despised modernity , because it seemed to him that nobody knew how to be alive. As the fight between left and right becomes increasingly absurd in the 21st century (for Nietzsche, a fight between those who want Socratic undeath and those who want, like Socrates, just actual death), another look at Nietzsche's ontology and politics is timely.

Thesis Eleven
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nietzsche's causality: On the enchanted and the automatic — Lachlan Ross · Thesis Eleven (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS