Assessment of Ratcheting: A Proposed Rule and Engineering Guideline to Prevent Ratcheting

Abstract For nuclear power plants, the combination of internal pressure and thermal fluctuations, under certain conditions, can cause ratcheting. Because of that, a ratcheting check is required for the components of a nuclear power plant that are subjected to those types of loadings. In these cases, ratcheting is mainly investigated using simplified rules. According to nuclear design codes (RCC-M, RCC-MRx, ASME, R5, etc), an elastic Finite Element Analysis (FEA) must be performed, and then the stresses have to be compared with criteria which ensure that (elastic or plastic) shakedown occurs. Because plasticity is not considered on the elastic FEA, those methods are often overly conservative. In such cases, alternative methods must be carried out. An alternative method is to perform a direct cycle-by-cycle elastic-plastic FEA in order to evaluate that the component is within shakedown and the accumulated plastic strain is lower than the strain criteria. However, that method is more computationally expensive and complex than the commonly used ones. The purpose of the paper is to propose a rule and an engineering guideline for the ratcheting assessment of austenitic stainless steels. The latter must be less conservative than simplified commonly used rules and without requiring a full cyclic elastic-plastic computation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2025-151762
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Ratcheting: A Proposed Rule and Engineering Guideline to Prevent Ratcheting

Olivier Ancelet, Jean Macedo, Antoine Martin
1 citations
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
article

Assessment of Ratcheting: A Proposed Rule and Engineering Guideline to Prevent Ratcheting

Olivier Ancelet, Jean Macedo, Antoine Martin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract For nuclear power plants, the combination of internal pressure and thermal fluctuations, under certain conditions, can cause ratcheting. Because of that, a ratcheting check is required for the components of a nuclear power plant that are subjected to those types of loadings. In these cases, ratcheting is mainly investigated using simplified rules. According to nuclear design codes (RCC-M, RCC-MRx, ASME, R5, etc), an elastic Finite Element Analysis (FEA) must be performed, and then the stresses have to be compared with criteria which ensure that (elastic or plastic) shakedown occurs. Because plasticity is not considered on the elastic FEA, those methods are often overly conservative. In such cases, alternative methods must be carried out. An alternative method is to perform a direct cycle-by-cycle elastic-plastic FEA in order to evaluate that the component is within shakedown and the accumulated plastic strain is lower than the strain criteria. However, that method is more computationally expensive and complex than the commonly used ones. The purpose of the paper is to propose a rule and an engineering guideline for the ratcheting assessment of austenitic stainless steels. The latter must be less conservative than simplified commonly used rules and without requiring a full cyclic elastic-plastic computation.

Framatome (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.