Allowable Axial Flaw Sizes Based on Code Given and Actual Measured Flow Stresses for High Toughness Ductile Pipes Subjected to Internal Pressure

Abstract When evaluating allowable flaw sizes for high toughness ductile pipes, failure stresses are necessary for the flawed pipes. The failure stresses are estimated by flow stresses for the pipe materials and the flow stress is usually given by the average of the yield strength and the ultimate tensile strength. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Section XI states to use the yield strengths and the ultimate tensile strengths defined by the ASME Code Section II Materials. The ASME Code Section XI also states that actual measured yield strengths and ultimate tensile strengths are possible to be used, alternatively. Values of yield strength and ultimate tensile strength given by the ASME Code Section II are conservative, corresponding to lower bound values. Then, it is easily inferred that the allowable stresses calculated by the code given flow stress are lower than the allowable stresses calculated by the actual measured flow stress. The objective of this paper is to compare the allowable stresses and allowable flaw lengths based on both the code and actual measured flow stresses for pipes with axial flaws subjected to internal pressure. It is further demonstrated that allowable flaw lengths based on the code flow stress are substantially shorter than those calculated based on the actual measured flow stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2025-152377
Primary Topic
Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allowable Axial Flaw Sizes Based on Code Given and Actual Measured Flow Stresses for High Toughness Ductile Pipes Subjected to Internal Pressure

Valéry Lacroix, Martin Négyesi, Kunio Hasegawa, Yoosung Ha
Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
article

Allowable Axial Flaw Sizes Based on Code Given and Actual Measured Flow Stresses for High Toughness Ductile Pipes Subjected to Internal Pressure

Valéry Lacroix, Martin Négyesi, Kunio Hasegawa, Yoosung Ha
article en

Abstract

Abstract When evaluating allowable flaw sizes for high toughness ductile pipes, failure stresses are necessary for the flawed pipes. The failure stresses are estimated by flow stresses for the pipe materials and the flow stress is usually given by the average of the yield strength and the ultimate tensile strength. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Section XI states to use the yield strengths and the ultimate tensile strengths defined by the ASME Code Section II Materials. The ASME Code Section XI also states that actual measured yield strengths and ultimate tensile strengths are possible to be used, alternatively. Values of yield strength and ultimate tensile strength given by the ASME Code Section II are conservative, corresponding to lower bound values. Then, it is easily inferred that the allowable stresses calculated by the code given flow stress are lower than the allowable stresses calculated by the actual measured flow stress. The objective of this paper is to compare the allowable stresses and allowable flaw lengths based on both the code and actual measured flow stresses for pipes with axial flaws subjected to internal pressure. It is further demonstrated that allowable flaw lengths based on the code flow stress are substantially shorter than those calculated based on the actual measured flow stress.

Tractebel Engineering (Belgium) (BE), Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JP), VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.