Uncertainty Quantification of Creep Crack Growth Predictions in Irradiated Metallic Components

Abstract Metallic components in high-temperature nuclear reactors typically operate in creep regimes where progressive crack growth mechanisms such as creep crack growth tend to be life-limiting. Informed by deformation and failure properties of the material, defect assessment procedures are then employed at the component level to quantify crack growth rates. Aleatoric uncertainty in material properties drives the adoption of bounding intervals in these inputs to ensure conservative assessments. In addition, irradiation effects on mechanical properties used in defect tolerance assessments translate into further uncertainties compared to the case of unirradiated material. The present paper adopts the use of Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) techniques to propagate the variability in underlying material properties used in defect assessments and concomitant irradiation effects on the overall defect assessment outcomes. Quantities of interest include creep ductility, creep rate, yield strength and hardening modulus, failure times and crack size. The particular case of pre-cracked unirradiated and irradiated Nimonic PE16 tie-bar component-type specimens is, here, explored as experimental data in irradiated state are available. The current evaluation to assess creep crack growth while focusing on providing insights on 1-uncertainty of the defect assessment procedure in predicting typically crack growth rate correlations such as a˙-K and a˙-C(t)⬚; 2-model sensitivity to specific material properties; 3- possible use of uncertainty estimates for the definition of failure criterion and inspection intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2025-154738
Primary Topic
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty Quantification of Creep Crack Growth Predictions in Irradiated Metallic Components

Markian Petkov, A. Garnica, Pierre-Alexandre Juan
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
article

Uncertainty Quantification of Creep Crack Growth Predictions in Irradiated Metallic Components

Markian Petkov, A. Garnica, Pierre-Alexandre Juan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Metallic components in high-temperature nuclear reactors typically operate in creep regimes where progressive crack growth mechanisms such as creep crack growth tend to be life-limiting. Informed by deformation and failure properties of the material, defect assessment procedures are then employed at the component level to quantify crack growth rates. Aleatoric uncertainty in material properties drives the adoption of bounding intervals in these inputs to ensure conservative assessments. In addition, irradiation effects on mechanical properties used in defect tolerance assessments translate into further uncertainties compared to the case of unirradiated material. The present paper adopts the use of Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) techniques to propagate the variability in underlying material properties used in defect assessments and concomitant irradiation effects on the overall defect assessment outcomes. Quantities of interest include creep ductility, creep rate, yield strength and hardening modulus, failure times and crack size. The particular case of pre-cracked unirradiated and irradiated Nimonic PE16 tie-bar component-type specimens is, here, explored as experimental data in irradiated state are available. The current evaluation to assess creep crack growth while focusing on providing insights on 1-uncertainty of the defect assessment procedure in predicting typically crack growth rate correlations such as a˙-K and a˙-C(t)⬚; 2-model sensitivity to specific material properties; 3- possible use of uncertainty estimates for the definition of failure criterion and inspection intervals.

Kairos (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.