Clarifying the Less than 1%: The False Alarm of Transition Regret, Discontinuation, and Detransition
Recent U.S. government directives under the Trump administration have prioritized funding research on regret and detransition following gender-affirming care. Empirical evidence demonstrates that regret following gender-affirming care is exceedingly rare, occurring in less than 1% of recipients according to systematic reviews-with epidemiological evidence estimating approximately 1 in 1 million people. This disproportionate research focus violates health equity principles by diverting resources from well-documented health disparities affecting larger segments of transgender and nonbinary (trans) populations. Studying such rare outcomes also presents extremely significant methodological challenges. We argue that epidemiological-based research priorities, rather than ideologically driven agenda should inform trans health.
Authors
- Don Operario (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2467-5048)
- Kristi E. Gamarel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-7515)
- Arjee Restar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2992-8198)
Institutions
- Emory University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Institute for Social Research (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Transgender Health
- Published
- 2025-10-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/26884887251364124
- Primary Topic
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00