Revisiting Spherical Shell Knockdown Factors Used for Design Protection Against Collapse From Buckling

Abstract The buckling performance of shells is well-known to be sensitive to geometric imperfections. Previous research has shown that when critical buckling stress is calculated without consideration of such imperfections, the analytical and experimental results can differ substantially. ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 2 Part 5 offers two distinct methodologies (Method A and B) for protection against collapse from buckling of shells. Both methods require usage of Finite Element Analysis methodology for evaluations. Method A uses linear materials and eigenvalue solution to calculate the allowable compressive stress by employing a knockdown factor (capacity reduction factor) to account for the imperfections that may exist in the vessel without explicitly modeling the imperfection itself. Conversely, Method B requires the imperfection to be included in the model based on fabrication tolerances and the mode shape calculated from the eigenvalue solution instead of using a knockdown factor. In this study, the basis of the knockdown factor that is used for Method A is revisited for the spherical shells using case studies. A comprehensive parametric study utilizing finite element analysis is performed on various spherical shell radius to thickness ratios. The case studies used in this paper all have critical buckling stresses below 55% of the yield stress. This enables the calculations for allowable external pressure using either Method A or B in accordance with the code. The allowable external pressure is calculated using Method B for various shell radius to thickness ratios using initial imperfections that are based on fabrication tolerance and dominant eigenvalue mode shapes. The results of Method B are then utilized to calculate alternative knockdown factors for Method A that will yield the same allowable external pressure calculated using Method B. These results are presented to establish a lower bound analysis based knockdown factor for spherical shells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2025-154167
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Spherical Shell Knockdown Factors Used for Design Protection Against Collapse From Buckling

Mandeep Singh, Koray Kuscu
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Revisiting Spherical Shell Knockdown Factors Used for Design Protection Against Collapse From Buckling

Mandeep Singh, Koray Kuscu
article en

Abstract

Abstract The buckling performance of shells is well-known to be sensitive to geometric imperfections. Previous research has shown that when critical buckling stress is calculated without consideration of such imperfections, the analytical and experimental results can differ substantially. ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 2 Part 5 offers two distinct methodologies (Method A and B) for protection against collapse from buckling of shells. Both methods require usage of Finite Element Analysis methodology for evaluations. Method A uses linear materials and eigenvalue solution to calculate the allowable compressive stress by employing a knockdown factor (capacity reduction factor) to account for the imperfections that may exist in the vessel without explicitly modeling the imperfection itself. Conversely, Method B requires the imperfection to be included in the model based on fabrication tolerances and the mode shape calculated from the eigenvalue solution instead of using a knockdown factor. In this study, the basis of the knockdown factor that is used for Method A is revisited for the spherical shells using case studies. A comprehensive parametric study utilizing finite element analysis is performed on various spherical shell radius to thickness ratios. The case studies used in this paper all have critical buckling stresses below 55% of the yield stress. This enables the calculations for allowable external pressure using either Method A or B in accordance with the code. The allowable external pressure is calculated using Method B for various shell radius to thickness ratios using initial imperfections that are based on fabrication tolerance and dominant eigenvalue mode shapes. The results of Method B are then utilized to calculate alternative knockdown factors for Method A that will yield the same allowable external pressure calculated using Method B. These results are presented to establish a lower bound analysis based knockdown factor for spherical shells.

Iron Mountain (United States) (US), Dnipro University of Technology (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.