Accuracy of ASME PCC-1 Bolting Patterns

Abstract This paper investigates the accuracy of various bolting patterns specified in ASME PCC-1, focusing on the Star, Modified Star, and Quadrant Cross patterns in bolted joint assembly. Bolting patterns are critical in distributing the load across flanged joints during assembly, and their performance must be validated against industry standards. Torque variation, commonly accepted as ±30%, is a key factor in determining the effectiveness of these patterns in ensuring consistent and reliable joint assemblies. This research evaluates whether different bolting sequences affect overall joint integrity by conducting tests on 12-inch Class 300 flanges with 16 studs. Previous research by Hamilton (2018) indicated that the Modified Star Pattern offers significant time savings over the Star Pattern, primarily due to fewer required passes over each stud. This paper extends that work by comparing not only time savings but also the accuracy of bolt stress achieved. Hydraulic torque tools were used to conduct the tests, and ultrasonic measurements provided data on bolt stretch to calculate the achieved bolt stress. The results show no significant difference in bolt stress accuracy between the patterns tested. Confidence intervals for bolt scatter were within acceptable ranges across different stud manufacturers, suggesting that end-users may opt for faster patterns like the Quadrant or Modified Star without compromising joint reliability. These findings highlight opportunities for improving assembly efficiency while maintaining safety and performance standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2025-154247
Primary Topic
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of ASME PCC-1 Bolting Patterns

S. Hamilton, J. H. P. Wilson, Barrett Meigs
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
article

Accuracy of ASME PCC-1 Bolting Patterns

S. Hamilton, J. H. P. Wilson, Barrett Meigs
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the accuracy of various bolting patterns specified in ASME PCC-1, focusing on the Star, Modified Star, and Quadrant Cross patterns in bolted joint assembly. Bolting patterns are critical in distributing the load across flanged joints during assembly, and their performance must be validated against industry standards. Torque variation, commonly accepted as ±30%, is a key factor in determining the effectiveness of these patterns in ensuring consistent and reliable joint assemblies. This research evaluates whether different bolting sequences affect overall joint integrity by conducting tests on 12-inch Class 300 flanges with 16 studs. Previous research by Hamilton (2018) indicated that the Modified Star Pattern offers significant time savings over the Star Pattern, primarily due to fewer required passes over each stud. This paper extends that work by comparing not only time savings but also the accuracy of bolt stress achieved. Hydraulic torque tools were used to conduct the tests, and ultrasonic measurements provided data on bolt stretch to calculate the achieved bolt stress. The results show no significant difference in bolt stress accuracy between the patterns tested. Confidence intervals for bolt scatter were within acceptable ranges across different stud manufacturers, suggesting that end-users may opt for faster patterns like the Quadrant or Modified Star without compromising joint reliability. These findings highlight opportunities for improving assembly efficiency while maintaining safety and performance standards.

LSP Technologies (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.